Under Pompeo, a foreign policy that fits the president’s world view

The sudden firing on Tuesday of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the former Exxon Mobil chief executive who never managed to capture the role of chief diplomat, makes room for a true believer in President Donald Trump’s “America First” views and a bitter critic of the Iran nuclear deal — but also a deep skeptic about whether negotiations will persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear arsenal. 

Tillerson’s anticipated replacement, CIA director Mike Pompeo, was among the harshest of critics of the 2015 nuclear agreement that world powers brokered with Iran. If confirmed, Pompeo would take over the State Department just as the president is weighing whether to ditch the deal altogether — even if it outrages European allies. 

The move would also put Pompeo, who has been immersed in the details of Pyongyang’s nuclear program, in a central role in running the negotiations with Kim Jong Un, the North Korean dictator whom Trump has said he will meet by May. 

For all the criticisms of Tillerson — and there were many, particularly in the State Department as he moved to slash its size — he was considered a restraining influence on Trump. Pompeo, in contrast, has been an enthusiastic defender of the president’s policies, to the point that many senior current and former CIA officials worried that he was far too political for the job. 

In his public comments — including his dubious contention Sunday that Trump has done more to constrain North Korea than any other president — Pompeo seemed to know he would probably soon switch from giving the president his daily intelligence brief to carrying out Trump’s blunt “America First” vision worldwide. 

“We’ve had a very good chemistry right from the beginning," Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday morning as he described his relationship with Pompeo. 

Chemistry is vital between any president and his chief global emissary. But the shift disrupts the delicate balance of power in the administration’s national security team. 

Tillerson and Jim Mattis, the defense secretary, had run something of a tag team to keep the president in check, finding common ground on policies from the Middle East to East Asia before stepping into the Situation Room. For the better part of a year, that put Trump in the position of having to overcome their unified advice, which also was sometimes aligned with the White House national security adviser, H.R. McMaster. 

One senior administration official who often sat in the backbenches of those meetings last week described Trump’s growing frustration at being hemmed in by his two principal national security Cabinet members. 

That seems particularly true on Iran, and Trump singled out that issue Tuesday as he was preparing to leave for California. He said he and Tillerson “disagree on things.” 

“When you look at the Iran deal — I think it’s terrible. I guess he thought it was OK,” the president said, referring to Tillerson. “I wanted to either break it or do something. And he felt a little bit differently.” 

His comments are certain to alarm European allies who have spent the last few days negotiating with Tillerson’s closest aide, Brian Hook, on a way to add to the agreement that limited Iran’s nuclear program, rather than reopen or scrap the deal. Those moves were intended to keep Trump from ditching the agreement in mid-May, when he faces a deadline over continued suspension of U.S. nuclear-related sanctions on Iran.  

The first Hook heard of Tillerson’s ouster was when a reporter for The New York Times called him for comment Tuesday morning, shortly after the secretary’s 405-day tenure was ended by presidential tweet. 

Tillerson’s denouement seemed rife with the symbolism of the change to come. After Trump was revealed to have used a vulgarity to disparage several African nations, he dispatched Tillerson on a lengthy trip to the continent last week to make it up to them. 

But while the secretary was away, Trump agreed to the meeting with Kim, catching Tillerson by surprise — even though he was the one who had long been arguing for opening up a diplomatic channel to North Korea. While in Africa, Tillerson took a day off to recover from what the State Department said was exhaustion from long nights catching up by phone with Washington. 

Then he got food poisoning, cut his travels short, and was fired upon landing in the United States. 

It was clear in recent months that Tillerson and Trump were barely talking. The frequent dinners the chief diplomat shared with the president last spring, when the two men were forming their views of how to approach the world, had ended. 

Trump had hired Tillerson because he liked his record of profits and expansion at Exxon, and thought his mane of white hair gave him the look of a secretary of state. But more recently, the president told aides he thought Tillerson was “weak” — the ultimate insult in Trump’s world. His affinity for Pompeo grew as the men bonded over intelligence warnings and authorizations for covert actions.  

Pompeo’s rise will solve one central problem in U.S. diplomacy over the past year: When Tillerson spoke, few thought he was speaking on behalf of the president. 

“It creates the possibility that someone who is up to speed with the issues, and has a comfortable working relationship with the president, is now in the chair,” said Richard Haass, who served several Republicans and Democrats in senior state department and National Security Council positions. 

America’s interlocutors, Haass added, will now believe the secretary of state “is speaking with the power and backing of the president. 

“The question is whether, when President Trump speaks, it sounds like he has consulted his secretary of state,” Haass, now the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said in a call from India. 

The one arena where Pompeo’s views are still a mystery is Russia. While serving in Congress, he was a critic of President Vladimir Putin. As CIA director, Pompeo said he believed intelligence assessments that Putin was behind the effort to influence the 2016 election — even though Trump has dismissed those reports for fear it would undercut the legitimacy of his election. 

Pompeo has not, however, gone the next step to describe what he thought the United States should do to counter Russia’s actions.  

In contrast, Tillerson had let known his increasing concern about Russia’s activities, and even about Putin, who famously presented him with an award for his deals with Russia while at Exxon. On Monday, his last day as secretary of state, he agreed with the British government that Russia was most likely behind the nerve gas attack on a Russian living in England — while the White House has hedged about Russia’s responsibilities. Pompeo’s views are not known.  

But perhaps the biggest unknown in the ascension of Pompeo is how it will affect any negotiations with North Korea. 

He has warned many times, since last summer, that Kim is “a few months” away from acquiring the ability to strike the United States with a nuclear weapon. That is based on a calculation of how long it will take the North to solve the final problems of designing a warhead that can survive re-entry into the atmosphere atop an intercontinental missile. 

But Pompeo has also been in charge of an active covert campaign against the North, which he has alluded to elliptically on several occasions. The question now is whether that covert effort — believed to include sabotage of North Korea’s supply chain and renewed cyberattacks on its missile and nuclear programs — will buy Trump enough time, and leverage, to make a negotiation work.  

No agency has been more skeptical about the chances of Kim’s giving up his arsenal than the CIA, under Pompeo. 

In a presentation last fall at George Washington University, one of the agency’s top Korea analysts said that in the CIA’s view, no amount of sanctions pressure would persuade Kim that it was worth giving up the weapons that he believes are his only defense from having his country overrun by the United States and its allies. 

Associates of Pompeo say he shares that view — which would suggest that while he may soon be running the North Korea negotiations, his expectations of success are limited. 

In retrospect, Tuesday’s shift could explain some comments Pompeo made over the weekend. In interviews on Fox and CBS, he said he had spent part of the weekend reviewing the CIA's internal history of U.S. negotiations with North Korea for the past quarter-century. That would have been an odd way for a CIA director to spend his reading time; it makes a lot of sense for a future secretary of state.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

Susan Pompeo’s role as ‘first lady of the CIA’ draws critics, defenders
Susan Pompeo’s role as ‘first lady of the CIA’ draws critics, defenders

Susan Pompeo, the wife of Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo, has taken an unusually active and prominent role at the organization, and has fashioned herself as an unofficial "first lady of the CIA," according to people with knowledge of her activities.  Pompeo, who is a volunteer at the CIA, uses office space on the seventh-floor...
Trump may reshuffle legal team to take on Mueller more aggressively
Trump may reshuffle legal team to take on Mueller more aggressively

President Donald Trump’s legal team was poised for a shake-up on Monday, according to two people briefed on the matter, as he openly discussed firing one of his lawyers, another considered resigning and a third — who pushed theories on television that Trump was framed by the FBI — joined the roster.  Trump has weighed aloud in...
How Kushner forged a bond with the Saudi crown prince
How Kushner forged a bond with the Saudi crown prince

One year ago, two young princes began to forge a friendship at a lunch meeting in the White House's regal State Dining Room.  A snowstorm had kept away President Donald Trump's scheduled guest that day, German Chancellor Angela Merkel — giving the president and his advisers, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, more time to spend with the...
‘You will not destroy America’: A Trump battle is no longer one-sided
‘You will not destroy America’: A Trump battle is no longer one-sided

Usually, top intelligence and law enforcement officials withdraw to lives of tight-lipped relative anonymity after their careers end. (Suffice it to say, they are not exactly known for viral Twitter battles.)  But as President Donald Trump has voiced his grievances against the FBI with a series of insult-laden tweets, his targets have responded...
Trump-linked political data firm offered to entrap politicians
Trump-linked political data firm offered to entrap politicians

Sitting in a hotel bar, Alexander Nix, who runs the political data firm Cambridge Analytica, had a few ideas for a prospective client looking for help in a foreign election. The firm could send an attractive woman to seduce a rival candidate and secretly videotape the encounter, Nix said, or send someone posing as a wealthy land developer to pass a...
More Stories