Rampell: If tax bill is so great, why does GOP keep lying about it?


Nearly every claim Republicans are using to market their tax plan is at best a distortion, at worst a deliberate falsehood.

Which raises the question: If their plan is really so great, why not sell it on the merits?

Consider just a few of the Republicans’ key talking points and their tenuous relationship to reality.

1. The tax cuts will pay for themselves.

“If we pass this tax reform package in something like its current form, we will reduce the size of the deficits,” Sen. Patrick J. Toomey, R-Pa., erstwhile budget hawk, said on “Meet the Press” on Sunday. “We will have smaller debt than we otherwise would.”

However, Republicans have been unable to locate any credible tax outfit that thinks their proposals will do anything other than lose money.

Republicans’ solution: Just lie about what the experts say!

In that same interview, Toomey cited a Tax Foundation report he claimed showed that the Senate bill would reduce deficits once you accounted for growth.

The Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank, uses relatively optimistic assumptions about the economic effects of tax cuts. But even its analysts determined the bill would increase deficits by a half-trillion dollars over the next decade.

2. The tax plan primarily helps the middle class.

Nope. The biggest benefits go to higher-income Americans, as New York University School of Law tax professor David C. Kamin has illustrated.

Lots of lower- and middle-income families won’t benefit at all. Many will be worse off.

Under both the Senate and House bills, nearly half of households making less than $100,000 will see either a negligible tax change or even a tax hike in 2019, according to calculations from Martin Sullivan, chief economist at Tax Analysts.

3.The bill will hurt President Trump.

To be clear, we don’t know precisely what either bill would do to his taxes because Trump won’t release his returns. But based on what we do know, it’s safe to say he and his family stand to benefit yooge-ly.

For example, both the Senate and House tax bills would repeal the alternative minimum tax (AMT), which cost Trump tens of millions in the most recent (leaked) tax return we have, from 2005. Both bills offer big cuts for income from “pass-through” corporations — such as the Trump Organization. And both bills would either kill or scale back estate taxes, allowing Trump’s kids to inherit his fortune tax-free.

4. This will be the biggest tax cut in history.

Arguably, the biggest tax cut ever was in 1872, according to Tax History Project Director Joseph Thorndike. That’s when Congress decided to get rid of income taxes entirely.

If you think going back 145 years is unfair, note that it’s also not the biggest tax cut in the past 100 years. Or the past 50.

In fact, it’s not even the biggest tax cut in the past five years, in either inflation-adjusted dollar terms or as a share of gross domestic product, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

5. The economy desperately needs a big tax cut.

The time for deficit-financed stimulus is when the economy is in recession, not one of the longest expansions on record. Otherwise, we’ll have no powder left in the keg when the economy actually needs it.

So, why all the falsehoods? Why not just sell their tax agenda on the merits?

Presumably because Trump and Republican lawmakers know they’re offering a plan the public doesn’t want. Ergo, they need to promise things the tax plan doesn’t do.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW DAVID HORSEY
POINT OF VIEW: YouTube shooter fits most important narrative of all

Few would have guessed the next shooting to make national news would be carried out by a female animal-rights activist enraged at YouTube for demonetizing her fitness videos. And because YouTube shooter Nasim Najafi Aghdam doesn’t fit into the familiar narratives of the gun epidemic, those on the right have taken to Twitter to create narratives...
Letters: Sandy Hook denier is indefensible

Sandy Hook denier is indefensible Palm Beach Post reader Barbara Susco praises disgraced former Florida Atlantic University professor James Tracy in her letter, “Pursuit of real news becomes paramount,” (April 17). As a father of an 8-year-old, my blood ran cold reading her defense of this monster who not only denied the reality of the...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW DAN WASSERMAN
POINT OF VIEW: We will be safer if we help the mentally ill homeless

For more than 30 years in the United States, we have not been able to institutionalize people with mental health issues without their consent unless they have broken a law warranting arrest. It is important to protect their rights, but it is also vital that they receive treatment so that we, as well as they, are safe. To a desperately impaired person...
More Stories