POINT OF VIEW: We need common sense gun laws

I am not an expert on guns or crime, or the conflicting statistics we hear about them. I am a citizen of the U.S., in the great experiment called representative democracy, which unfortunately is not faring well these days, notably in our own country.

The First Amendment grants me the right to speak about the Second, and so I offer some observations about the justifications for the current state of affairs vis-à-vis gun ownership.

The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, and so we should not impinge on access to guns, including semi-automatic rifles.

Almost no one would suggest that my Second Amendment right extends to stockpiling chemical weapons, owning surface-to-air-missiles and bazooka launchers, or equipping a drone with bombs to drop on herds of deer for “sport.” Common sense dictates limits to this basic freedom. There is no common sense purpose to owning guns and ammunition designed to solely make murder and mass murder easier and more efficient. Banning semi-automatic weapons and armor piercing bullets are reasonable limits to the right to bear arms.

If we take away guns, only criminals will have them.

That is akin to saying, “If we make driving 120 mph illegal, only criminals will speed.” We already did that, not because we believe that everyone will obey the law, but rather because we believe that common sense laws concerning dangers to our citizenry are necessary. Automobiles can kill and so we require instruction and tests in order to operate them. Will someone drive without a license? Yes. Will people die due to automobile accidents? Yes. Do these things infer that driving laws can’t effectively reduce dangers to society? No.

The government wants to take away our guns so they can torture and enslave us.

Yes, people actually have this paranoid delusion, and thus refer to the “well regulated militia” clause in the Second Amendment. I think it goes without saying that a group of self-described patriots armed with semi-automatic rifles have no chance of defeating the U.S. military and its arsenal. The ballot box has always been our most potent weapon in ensuring democracy’s promise.

As I wrote above, the government has limited my right to drive by ensuring that I have been trained and licensed, and passing laws making it illegal to drive under the influence or recklessly. The government also limits what vehicle I may drive. It could be great fun to make my way down U.S. 1 in an armored tank, but the government won’t certify me to do that, thus limiting the “firepower” of my vehicle ownership.

Over the past 250 years, our free country has debated what is moral and just. We want to protect citizens from avarice while encouraging innovation and growth, and so we debate finance laws and environmental laws. We want to protect citizens from dangers and so we inspect and legislate around infrastructure, food, drugs, etc. The two-party system is designed to balance pros, cons and competing agendas, resulting in compromise and consensus to best serve the “us” that is “U.S.”

In the wake of the most recent tragedy in Parkland, not far from where I work each day, we have another moment to ponder who we are. We have lost our way — temporarily, I hope — and common sense gun legislation is a great test for whether or not we can find our way back.


Editor’s note: Berg is dean at the University of Miami’s Frost School of Music.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Get me back my turkey

Many years ago, the Israeli Bedouin expert Clinton Bailey told me a story about a Bedouin chief who discovered one day that his favorite turkey had been stolen. He called his sons together and told them: “Boys, we are in great danger now. My turkey’s been stolen. Find my turkey.” His boys just laughed and said, “Father, what...
Opinion: A parable of self-destruction

EASTER ISLAND — This remote speck in the South Pacific is famous for its colossal stone statues, nearly 1,000 of them towering over the landscape like guardians. Who built them? How did they get there? And who fitted some of them with giant red stone hats weighing up to 12 tons each? When I was a kid, a huge nonfiction best seller by Erich von...
Opinion: Women promise to storm the swamp

How many times have we heard that this is the year of the woman? Let’s just say, several. Each decade for the past century or so seems to have presented a fresh feature to justify yet another proclamation of historic import. From suffrage (1920) to the pill (1960) and to legalized abortion (1973) to Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine (1972) to &ldquo...
Editorial: Despite new law, Florida needs bigger commitment on opioids
Editorial: Despite new law, Florida needs bigger commitment on opioids

With plenty of pomp, Gov. Rick Scott came to Boca Raton on Monday to ceremoniously sign a high-profile bill designed to prevent Floridians from getting hooked on opioids. If only this new law were anywhere near as powerful as the addictions it hopes to combat. Although the governor last year declared a public health emergency, the reality is that he...
Letters: Jupiter, developer insult our intelligence

Jupiter, developer insult our intelligence Thousands of residences have been built in Jupiter over the past two decades, and not once can I remember the subject of “cheaper” new construction being addressed. I refrain from the overused terminology of “affordable” housing since all homes built are affordable to someone &mdash...
More Stories