POINT OF VIEW: Managed repair programs by Florida insurers a bad idea


A recent op-ed piece written by a lobbyist for the Florida Property & Casualty Association endorsed the increased use of managed repair programs by insurers in Florida. The op-ed promotes an anti-consumer cost-saving strategy being implemented by insurers and maligned the public-adjusting industry for expressing concern with these managed repair programs.

Public Insurance Adjusters are licensed insurance professionals who use their skills and expertise to help policyholders. The author of the opinion piece wants us to believe these insurance professionals are a bunch of crooks who deliver “empty promises.” Rather than take shots at public adjusters, it’s more important to stick to the facts when trying to address a problem.

The author fails to mention the documented evidence that public-adjuster participation generally results in full, fair and increased compensation to policyholders. The Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) conducted a study of public-adjuster representation in Citizens Property Insurance Corp. claims. They found that Citizens policyholders who used public adjusters received higher compensation on their claims than those that don’t. In other words, it is the public adjuster who is holding the insurance company’s feet to the fire and making sure that they pay their policyholders what they are rightfully owed.

The op-ed also asserts that public adjusters are “vehemently opposed” to insurers offering their policyholders the option to manage their repair process. This is simply not true. If insurers want to offer voluntary managed repair programs where policyholders have the choice of who and what will be repaired in their homes there would no objection. But that is not what is happening. In fact, what Citizens is proposing is much worse. Citizens is asking the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) to approve language that will penalize policyholders who don’t select to use their repair vendors. Translation: If you do not choose to have strangers selected by Citizens come into your home to make repairs, you will be penalized with an arbitrary $10,000 limit of coverage, regardless of the amount of coverage you bought and paid for.

As consumer advocates, we are compelled to speak out and bring awareness to this issue. Everyone’s focus should always remain on whether policyholders are treated fairly and compensated fully. Managed repair is an insurer cost-saving measure that should not be forced on policyholders with the threat of a penalty that would cause financial hardship.

DON PHILLIPS, TALLAHASSEE

Editor’s note: Don Phillips is president of the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Our ‘America first’ president put America last in Helsinki

America’s child president had a playdate with a KGB alumnus, who surely enjoyed providing daycare. It was a useful, illuminating event: Now we shall see how many Republicans retain a capacity for embarrassment. Jeane Kirkpatrick, a Democrat closely associated with such Democratic national security stalwarts as Sen. Henry Jackson and former Sen...
Opinion: Spare me your shock at Trump’s sellout to Putin

“Lawmakers in both major parties and former intelligence officials appeared shocked …” —The Chicago Tribune “U.S. lawmakers of both political parties reacted with shock …” —Voice of America “Some of Mr. Trump’s own advisers privately said they were shocked …” —The New...
POINT OF VIEW: NATO is about more than money

I take serious objection to the Palm Beach Post letter-writer who thinks that money is the key to the U.S. relationship with NATO. Having worked with NATO for more than 12 years, I have a deeper understanding of the extremely high value NATO plays in our security. The idea that we are bearing a higher portion of the total funding belies the value of...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW WALT HANDELSMAN
Letters: Ex-lifeguard can attest: Reeds treated employees well

Reeds treated employees well Thank you for your recent article, “The Reeds,” (Tuesday), on the Reeds and the Jupiter Island Club. I was a seasonal lifeguard at JIC from the late ’80s to the mid-2000s. As the article states, they did treat their employees with kindness and respect. They had annual get-togethers and even weekly employee...
More Stories