breaking news

Storms spreading south in Palm Beach County as rush hour approaches

POINT OF VIEW: In another country, we would call this corruption

The tax reform plan will not personally benefit Donald Trump. Or so claims Donald Trump.

It would leave him “a big loser,” Donald Trump said last month. “This is going to cost me a fortune, this thing, believe me,” he said more recently. “This is not good for me.”

The White House is echoing this line. Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said last Tuesday that while Trump might benefit “on the business side,” she added that “on the personal side the president will likely take a big hit.”

And yet, when pressed on whether he will release his tax returns so that we can verify this, Sanders once again said that Trump will not, because, she claimed, he remains under audit.

It’s hard to overemphasize what a sign this is of the incipient and continued corruption of politics in the United States. Almost no one, whether an expert in tax law or just a random member of the voting public, believes Trump, a man who lies so often that esteemed presidential historian Bob Dallek called it “pathological,” is telling the truth about what he can expect from the tax reform. As The Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler recently demonstrated, it could potentially cut his tax bills by tens of millions of dollars.

Americans know this and would like him to release his returns to verify it. A CNN poll released last Tuesday found that 63 percent of those surveyed believe the bill would enrich the Trump family. Almost three-quarters — 73 percent — agreed Trump should release his taxes for “public review.”

Until Trump came along, every president since Richard Nixon has released his taxes so that voters (and others) could review them. It has become a norm over the years. Beyond providing basic transparency, this has also shown that the system works, that our president — or the people who would be president — are not taking advantage of their position to enrich themselves at the expense of the public.

But Trump broke with precedent during the campaign, repeatedly claiming that he was under audit.

It’s hooey. There is no rule banning anyone from releasing his tax returns while under audit.

But the rot goes deeper than Trump. Republicans in Congress could probably get a gander at Trump’s tax returns if they so wanted.

“I can’t come up with any good faith reason they wouldn’t want to do this,” Susan Hennessey, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, and editor of the Lawfare blog, told me in an interview today after I reached out to her because she tweeted on the topic. “If there is nothing there, it would really be a favor to the White House because they could speak with credibility on the issue and really validate White House talking points.”

Instead, we are left with the sense that congressional Republicans so wanted this unpopular tax reform legislation to pass, they didn’t want to look under the hood of Trump’s tax returns and find out how he and his family benefit.

If this occurred in almost any other country, we would almost certainly call it legalized corruption. Instead, it’s just another day in Trump’s United States.


Editor’s note: Helaine Olen is a contributor to The Washington Post’s Plum Line blog.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Palm Beach Post editorial cartoon Tues, April 24
Palm Beach Post editorial cartoon Tues, April 24

Opinion: Evangelicals can’t advance dignity by dehumanizing others

If the stages of a social movement are emergence, coalescence, bureaucratization and decline, the reaction against the Trump evangelicals among other evangelicals is still in the emergence stage. But one significant act of coalescence took place recently at Wheaton College, where a group of 50 ethnically and denominationally diverse evangelical leaders...
Opinion: Educational fraud continues

Earlier this month, the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress, aka The Nation’s Report Card, was released. It’s not a pretty story. Only 37 percent of 12th-graders tested proficient or better in reading, and only 25 percent did so in math. Among black students, only 17 percent tested proficient or better in reading, and just...
Opinion: Barbara Bush: Fake pearls, genuine heart

Barbara Bush was an expert at throwing shade, even before the term existed. When Congressman Dan Rostenkowski gave the first lady a shampoo for white hair made in his Illinois district, she tried it on her dog Millie. “When I shampooed her with it, she became a brown and slightly yellow-haired dog,” she wrote in her memoir. “At this...
Opinion: Remembering Barbara Bush, grieving mother

My mother and Barbara Bush were contemporaries. Despite coming from very different backgrounds — daughter of a Kansas farmer and daughter of a New York City businessman — they had a common experience, a very human link. It’s a sad connection that I suspect also has many a woman feeling fondly toward Bush, who died Tuesday at 92. Both...
More Stories