Opinion: Behind Trump’s anger and exasperation


At the G-7 summit in Canada, President Donald Trump described America as “the piggy bank that everybody is robbing.”

In Singapore, Trump tweeted more about that piggy bank.

“Why should I, as President of the United States, allow countries to continue to make Massive Trade Surpluses, as they have for decades … (while) the U.S. pays close to the entire cost of NATO-protecting many of these same countries that rip us off on Trade?”

Our elites see America as an “indispensable nation,” the premier world power whose ordained duty it is to defend democracy, stand up to dictators and aggressors, and uphold a liberal world order.

They see U.S. wealth and power as splendid tools that fate has given them to shape the future of the planet.

Trump sees America as a nation being milked by allies who free ride on our defense effort, as they engage in trade practices that prosper their own peoples at America’s expense.

Where our elites live to play masters of the universe, Trump sees a world laughing behind America’s back, while allies exploit our magnanimity and idealism for their own national ends.

The numbers are impossible to refute and hard to explain.

Last year, the EU had a $151 billion trade surplus with the U.S. China ran a $376 billion trade surplus with the U.S., the largest in history. The world sold us $796 billion more in goods than we sold to the world.

A nation that spends more than it takes in from taxes, and consumes more of the world’s goods than it produces itself for export, year in and year out, is a nation on the way down.

Trump understands that this situation is not sustainable.

Yet he faces some serious obstacles.

What is his strategy for turning a $796 billion trade deficit into a surplus? Is he prepared to impose the tariffs and import restrictions that would be required to turn America from the greatest trade-deficit nation in history to a trade-surplus nation, as we were up until the mid-1970s?

Americans are indeed carrying the lion’s share of the load of the defense of the West, and of fighting the terrorists and radical Islamists of the Middle East, and of protecting South Korea and Japan.

But if our NATO and Asian allies refuse to make the increases in defense he demands, is Trump really willing to cancel our treaty commitments, walk away from our war guarantees, and let these nations face Russia and China on their own?

Ike’s Secretary of State John Foster Dulles spoke of conducting an “agonizing reappraisal” of U.S. commitments to defend NATO allies, if they did not contribute more money and troops.

Dulles died in 1959, and that reappraisal, threatened 60 years ago, never happened. Indeed, when the Cold War ended, our NATO allies cut defense spending again. Yet we are still subsidizing NATO in Europe and have taken on new allies since the Soviet Empire fell.

If Europe refuses to invest the money in defense Trump demands, or accept the tariffs America needs to reduce and erase its trade deficits, what does he do? Is he prepared to shut U.S. bases and pull U.S. troops out of the Baltic republics, Poland and Germany, and let the Europeans face Vladimir Putin and Russia themselves?

The crunch that was inevitable when Trump was elected seems at hand.

He promised to force our NATO allies to undertake more of their own defense. He pledged to get out and stay out of Mideast wars, and begin to slash the trade deficits that we have run with the world.

And that’s what America voted for.

Writes for Creators Syndicate.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW SIGNE WILKINSON
Commentary: North Korea is now under minimum pressure
Commentary: North Korea is now under minimum pressure

Last week, the leaders of the two Koreas made progress toward rapprochement, concluding a dramatic summit in Pyongyang. Though President Donald Trump was not in attendance, he sought to take credit for the latest diplomatic gains. In remarks to reporters Wednesday morning, the president suggested that, before his arrival on the political scene, war...
POINT OF VIEW: The economics of weather disasters
POINT OF VIEW: The economics of weather disasters

Hurricanes impose huge losses of wealth and initially slow regional economies, but over time they can be a tonic that creates more prosperous communities. After Florence, resort areas along the coast and thriving commercial areas inland are likely to rebuild quickly, but poorer, rural inland communities may be left to languish. Initial estimates of...
Letters: Look to the past for school solutions
Letters: Look to the past for school solutions

Look to the past for school solutions Re: Education. The information widely available should be disturbing to all. To slip from first to 31st in three decades is a travesty. In academia or not, it would appear abundantly clear what did work for many a prior decade. No need to re-invent the wheel. A return by students to respect for teachers and schools...
Editorial: Public needs better protection from pilot error
Editorial: Public needs better protection from pilot error

According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), there are 813,2000 pilots licensed to fly in the United States. What the regulatory agency doesn’t know is how many pilots climb into the cockpits of planes and fly in the U.S. without a valid license. And there’s the rub. Pilots, airport operators and government regulators readily...
More Stories