Letters Took some time, but Mast came around

Took some time, but

Mast came around

It is good to see that U.S. Brian Mast, R-Palm City, would support some gun control measures.

After over a year in office, it took a tragedy to remind him that he was elected to represent the people of his district and not the National Rifle Association. But that’s OK. Better late than never.


Teens have most

common sense of all

President Trump speaks of solving the gun control problem with common sense. The ban on assault rifles, which kill many more people than one gun can, would cost zero dollars. Arming teachers, who should not have to be combatants in school, would cost $500 million, according to Gov. Scott, for Florida alone. Is that an example of common sense?

Wouldn’t the gun manufacturers and the NRA love selling more guns? One or two guns for every school in America. I don’t know how many schools we have, but it must be thousands. And in order to give them an even chance, maybe we should arm our teachers with assault rifles just in case someone attempts to kill with an assault weapon. They are, after all, easier to buy than a gun.

I do not want to take away from stable and decent people their right to own a handgun or hunting rifle — they are not the ones who make the news. What I do want is a ban on assault weapons, which have no place in anyone’s home. Unless someone sets out to kill as many people as possible, assault weapons should be a tool for warfare only and do not belong readily available in any civilized society.

Please listen to the young people. They have more common sense than most of our politicians.


A quick plea deal

best for all involved

Since the tragic shooting in Parkland, the attorney for the shooter has attempted to enter into a plea agreement with Broward State Attorney Mike Satz, offering to plead guilty to all 17 counts of first-degree murder in exchange for an automatic sentence of life without a chance for parole.

Satz has not made a decision on this offer. However, he has said: “This certainly is the type of case the death penalty was designed for.”

I am hopeful that Satz does not see this as an opportunity to advance his career with a high-profile murder trial whose conclusion is all but assured. The survivors of this event will be best served by a quick conclusion to this nightmare.

The students who are currently trying to assimilate this experience need to talk to professional counselors and each other, and then put it behind them as quickly as possible. A trial will guarantee this experience will become the focal part of their lives for years to come.

The families of the victims also need to be able to move on as soon as possible as best they can, lest their lives also get sucked into a spiral around the shooter and the slowly moving justice system.

There is no “closure” in the death penalty. Unfortunately, there is rarely any closure under any circumstances — it’s just something people say to offer you hope that someday you may feel better about your loved one being a victim.

A quick plea deal is the best chance for people to regain some normalcy back into their lives in the shortest time frame. It would be an additional, cruel tragedy if the prosecutor did not do this.

It’s a shame the court can’t include the provision that the murderer’s name never is spoken or written again.


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

POINT OF VIEW: “Stand Your Ground”: A good law for bad situations

On July 19, Michael Drejka shot and killed Markeis McGlockton in a Clearwater parking lot. Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri declined to charge Drejka, citing the state’s “stand your ground” law. Outrage ensued. It was just an argument over a parking spot, some say, hinting that the whole thing is Drejka’s fault in the first...
Readers weigh in on attacks upon freedom of the press

Repudiating the notion that the U.S. media are “the enemy of the people,” The Palm Beach Post on Thursday joined with more than 350 other newspapers to assert, each in its own way, the critical importance of a free and independent press. Our editorial, “In defense of democracy’s defenders,” elicited strong responses, pro...
Commentary: The Myth of a GOP ‘War on the Poor’
Commentary: The Myth of a GOP ‘War on the Poor’

Has the Republican Party declared “war on the poor”? That is the recent accusation from New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, adding that Republicans “are fanatical about cutting off aid to the less fortunate” because “they hate the idea of government helping anyone.” Krugman is a brilliant international trade economist...
Commentary: Weakening anti-poverty programs would harm millions
Commentary: Weakening anti-poverty programs would harm millions

A new report from President Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers argues that U.S. anti-poverty programs have reduced poverty so dramatically that we should now take assistance like SNAP (previously food stamps), Medicaid, and rental assistance away from people who don’t work a certain number of hours each week. Never mind that other proponents...
Opinion: Bad men, but good presidents

With the continuing hysteria about Donald Trump’s presidency, a few questions come to mind. The first: Can a bad man become a good president? The second: Does one’s being a good man guarantee he’ll be a good president? Third: Does having a good president require a good man? Is there any evidence of Lord Acton’s argument that...
More Stories