Letters: Legislature all about deep-pocketed special interests

How come everything that Tallahassee does is in the interest of the special interest groups, and not the people of Florida?

Don’t ban assault weapons, that would offend the NRA. Don’t get rid of PIP, that will offend the insurance lobby. Don’t pass texting and driving, God knows who that will offend.

FULL COVERAGE: Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting

What did they pass to help us lower our insurance, protect the kids in school, punish drivers who put our lives at risk? Nothing.

All Tallahassee cares about is their special interest groups and not the people of Florida.


Ban all civilian access to war weapons

I wish to join the voices advocating the outlawing of purchasing and ownership of automatic rapid-fire rifles and handguns. These weapons belong only in the hands of our uniformed military and police to enforce our safety. They have no purpose for civilians.

Given the large number of other available rifles and handguns, the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment are more than adequately supported for our citizens. What about the support of our children and innocent bystanders, thousands of whom have been killed in recent decades?

The debate is not about mental instability, for without access to such weapons, we’d be talking about far fewer fatalities.

We should have a right to protect ourselves by using restrictive laws to prevent all access to such weapons. Those owning or selling them must be required by law to turn them in and we should compensate them for doing so. Those who don’t submit these weapons should be severely punished once such a return policy is enacted.

We must decide if our society should leave this responsibility to individual state legislatures or to our Congress and president.

The logic is straightforward: KISS — keep it simple, stupid. I no longer want to be stupid.


Editor’s note: David Papermaster is a retired physician, medical educator, scientist, and Solomon Professor of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Science Center.

Gun issue is about security, not rights

The NRA, in the wake of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, has responded with the usual statement that banning assault rifles would “infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners.”

Based on this logic, should we remove all speed limits on public roads so “law-abiding” citizens can drive as fast as they want? Of course not.

The only “law-abiding” use for assault rifles is for target practice at a gun range. So, do communities throughout the United States need to spend millions of dollars to harden our soft targets (schools, malls, churches, movie theaters, gyms, etc.) with metal detectors, armed teachers and armed guards just so “law-abiding” citizens can get their thrill of shooting an assault rifle?

The NRA’s logic is preposterous. The banning of assault rifles is a public security issue, not a gun rights issue.

Should we, as a society, be forced to accept mass shootings as the norm? Or should we follow what the Australians did in 1994: Ban all assault rifle sales and institute gun buybacks to get these weapons off the streets? To date, there has not been one mass shooting in Australia since then.


How many must die before NRA wakes up?

How many kids need to be shot before our Congress wakes up? How many tears must parents shed before their pain is heard?

Is the NRA deaf? Or do they have no heart?


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters: Control of time not so cut and dried

Control of time not so cut and dried The Florida Legislature recently passed a bill to keep daylight saving time all year. Sen. Marco Rubio has submitted two bills to Congress on the subject: One bill to keep daylight saving time all year for the entire country, the second to allow Florida to remain on DST even if the rest of the county does not. The...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

POINT OF VIEW: America is getting older, and so are its drivers

The U.S. population will exceed 400 million by 2060, according to Census Bureau projections released this month. That includes an increase in the older population that will have major implications for transportation. While the size of each age group is expected to grow, the teenage population will rise only 8 percent as the group over 65 nearly doubles...
Letters: Government, insurers at root of opioid issue

Government, insurers at root of opioid issue Re the opioid problem: The government and the insurance companies are responsible. They pay only for drugs or surgeries. They will not cover any alternative measures. In my 30s, I had a sports injury to my spine. After years of pain, the only hope I had was the painkillers. They worked for a time but I had...
POINT OF VIEW: Everyone can support common-sense insurance reforms

In a recent letter published in The Palm Beach Post, a representative of the insurance industry incorrectly claims that public adjusters have been lobbying against Assignment of Benefits (AOB) reform — along with lobbyists for trial lawyers and water restoration companies. This statement is wrong on so many levels that it demands a response....
More Stories