Friedman: How Trump made Putin’s Christmas


At the end of this banner stock market year, you can bet that major business publications will be naming their investor of the year. You can stop now. I have the winner, and nobody is even close when it comes to his total return on investment: Vladimir Putin, the Russian president.

A recent report in The Washington Post, quoting intelligence sources, said Putin may have spent less than $500,000 to hack our last election and help (though Hillary Clinton helped much more) Donald Trump become president. And Putin’s payoff is Trump’s first year: a president who is simultaneously eroding some of our most basic norms, undermining some of our most cherished institutions and enacting a mammoth tax bill that will not make America great again.

If you assume, as I do, that Putin wants to see an America that is not an attractive model for his own people or others to emulate, and that he wants an America run by a chaos president who cannot lead the West, then Trump is his dream come true.

So Vladimir Putin, come on up! You’re my Investor of the Year. You’re the Warren Buffett of geopolitics.

Putin never could have dreamed up this deformed Trump-GOP tax bill, but it is precisely how you don’t make America great again. We actually have a tried-and-true formula for that — one employed by every great president since our founding. It has five parts, and this bill pretty much ignores all five.

First, we’ve always educated our citizens up to and beyond whatever the main technology of the day was — when it was the cotton gin, that meant universal primary education; when it was the factory, that meant universal high school; and now that it is the computer and artificial intelligence, it should be some form of postsecondary education for all — and then lifelong learning. If we were really doing tax reform intelligently, we’d make all postsecondary education tax-deductible, to encourage everyone to become a lifelong learner.

Second, we invested in the best infrastructure — roads, rail, ports, airports, telecom. This tax bill not only makes no provision for that, it actually erodes such investments in many states. With a limitation on the deduction for state and local taxes, and the deficit’s ballooning by $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion, many cities and the federal government will have fewer resources for new schools and bridges.

Third, we had the best rules to incentivize risk-taking and to prevent recklessness. I am all for cutting corporate taxes — and payroll taxes — but I’d offset them with a carbon tax that would simultaneously combat climate change and stimulate renewable energy. It never occurred to Trump.

Fourth, we had, in the last century, the most open immigration policy to attract the most high-IQ risk-takers, the people who often start new business, as well as high-energy lower-skilled workers. I don’t have to tell you where Trump is on that.

Fifth, we had the most government-funded research to push out the boundaries of science so our companies could pluck the best ideas — witness the internet and GPS — to start new industries. The surge in the deficit created by this tax bill will curtail precisely such research.

So there you have it: a tax “reform” bill that defies all five principles that made us great for 2½ centuries.

Even Putin surely could not have imagined that Trump would be this foolish and the Republican Party this cynical. It’s just the extra dollop of caviar on Vladimir’s Christmas blini.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW DAVID HORSEY
POINT OF VIEW: YouTube shooter fits most important narrative of all

Few would have guessed the next shooting to make national news would be carried out by a female animal-rights activist enraged at YouTube for demonetizing her fitness videos. And because YouTube shooter Nasim Najafi Aghdam doesn’t fit into the familiar narratives of the gun epidemic, those on the right have taken to Twitter to create narratives...
Letters: Sandy Hook denier is indefensible

Sandy Hook denier is indefensible Palm Beach Post reader Barbara Susco praises disgraced former Florida Atlantic University professor James Tracy in her letter, “Pursuit of real news becomes paramount,” (April 17). As a father of an 8-year-old, my blood ran cold reading her defense of this monster who not only denied the reality of the...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW DAN WASSERMAN
POINT OF VIEW: We will be safer if we help the mentally ill homeless

For more than 30 years in the United States, we have not been able to institutionalize people with mental health issues without their consent unless they have broken a law warranting arrest. It is important to protect their rights, but it is also vital that they receive treatment so that we, as well as they, are safe. To a desperately impaired person...
More Stories