Editorial: Keep Pinto, Smith on Royal Palm Beach council


You would think, with all of the hyperbole — tinged with a certain level of animus — during this election campaign, that Royal Palm Beach has some serious “issues” dividing the village. But it doesn’t. At least not when compared to many municipalities in the county.

Royal Palm Beach is sitting on a roughly $80 million reserve, operating debt-free and expanding its tax base with smart development like the Tuttle mixed-use project near State Road 7 and Southern Boulevard. While the village did have a specific issue with vehicle break-ins, even that now seems well in hand.

MAYOR: But the rematch between incumbent Mayor Fred Pinto, 67, and former Village Councilwoman Martha Webster, 71, is just as fiery as it was two years ago.

The animosity between these two candidates is indicative of lasting divisions — and wounds — once inflicted by a “good old boy” network that seemed to shut down any real dissent.

Pinto, whose leadership style can certainly come across as abrasive, still has work to do in healing those divisions. But the same can be said of those backing Webster’s campaign — after three consecutive losses.

While her credentials are still impeccable, she readily admits that the primary reason she is running is to “return integrity” to the mayor’s office after a domestic incident in which Pinto was arrested and spent a night in jail with no charges filed. Though embarrassing and disturbing, Pinto has apologized for the incident, and he and his wife from all outward appearances have reconciled their differences.

“I’d really like to keep personal politics out of our village administration,” Pinto said.

Because we’ve seen no evidence that the incident is indicative of a deeper leadership flaw, the Post is endorsing Pinto in the March 13 election. He has provided solid fiscal leadership, while prioritizing infrastructure improvements and public safety and emphasizing more community involvement.

GROUP 3: And leading the way on community involvement is Councilwoman Selena Smith, 45, whom The Post is endorsing to keep her seat on the dais.

Smith, in addition to providing a strong independent voice, has established herself as a leader on senior living issues and transparency on the council. She also worked to re-vamp the village’s sign ordinance, which benefited local businesses, and initiated meetings with code enforcement and residents.

In addition to keeping the community updated via social media like Facebook, Smith said she walks the community to talk with residents face-to-face.

Her opponent is Sam Roman, 48, a local business entrepreneur and community outreach coordinator with the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.

***

Read all of the Post’s endorsements online at www.MyPalmBeachPost.com/2018-endorsements.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

POINT OF VIEW: “Stand Your Ground”: A good law for bad situations

On July 19, Michael Drejka shot and killed Markeis McGlockton in a Clearwater parking lot. Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri declined to charge Drejka, citing the state’s “stand your ground” law. Outrage ensued. It was just an argument over a parking spot, some say, hinting that the whole thing is Drejka’s fault in the first...
Readers weigh in on attacks upon freedom of the press

Repudiating the notion that the U.S. media are “the enemy of the people,” The Palm Beach Post on Thursday joined with more than 350 other newspapers to assert, each in its own way, the critical importance of a free and independent press. Our editorial, “In defense of democracy’s defenders,” elicited strong responses, pro...
Commentary: The Myth of a GOP ‘War on the Poor’
Commentary: The Myth of a GOP ‘War on the Poor’

Has the Republican Party declared “war on the poor”? That is the recent accusation from New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, adding that Republicans “are fanatical about cutting off aid to the less fortunate” because “they hate the idea of government helping anyone.” Krugman is a brilliant international trade economist...
Commentary: Weakening anti-poverty programs would harm millions
Commentary: Weakening anti-poverty programs would harm millions

A new report from President Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers argues that U.S. anti-poverty programs have reduced poverty so dramatically that we should now take assistance like SNAP (previously food stamps), Medicaid, and rental assistance away from people who don’t work a certain number of hours each week. Never mind that other proponents...
Opinion: Bad men, but good presidents

With the continuing hysteria about Donald Trump’s presidency, a few questions come to mind. The first: Can a bad man become a good president? The second: Does one’s being a good man guarantee he’ll be a good president? Third: Does having a good president require a good man? Is there any evidence of Lord Acton’s argument that...
More Stories