breaking news

No bond for teen facing murder charge in BallenIsles fatal stabbing

Companies use savings from tax cuts to buy back their own shares

President Donald Trump promised that his tax cut would encourage companies to invest in factories, workers and wages, setting off a spending spree that would reinvigorate the American economy. 

Companies have announced plans for some of those investments. But so far, companies are using much of the money for something with a more narrow benefit: buying their own shares. 

Those buybacks are good for shareholders, including the senior executives who tend to be big owners of their companies’ stock. A company purchasing its own shares is a time-tested way to bolster its stock price. 

But the purchases can come at the expense of investments in things like hiring, research and development and building new plants — the sort of investments that directly help the overall economy. The buybacks will also most likely worsen economic inequality because the benefits of stocks purchases flow disproportionately to the richest Americans. 

The tax overhaul is the cornerstone of Trump’s economic plan. It has been a big win for companies, offering lower corporate rates and a permanent break on overseas profits. Warren E. Buffett said in his annual letter to investors Saturday that his company, Berkshire Hathaway, enjoyed a $29 billion gain thanks to the new tax law. 

What companies do with the trillions of dollars they’re bringing back to the United States, and the money they will save each year on their tax bills, will in large part determine whether the plan is a success or a failure. 

As the tax cuts kick in, companies have laid out a variety of uses for the money. Some are paying out one-time bonuses to employees. Others are raising salaries. Others plan to open new factories. 

In the fourth quarter, U.S. companies’ investments in things like factories and business equipment grew 6.8 percent. That was the fastest growth rate since 2014, but far from a surge in capital spending that was promised before the tax overhaul. 

But the buying back of shares is also at record levels. 

Almost 100 U.S. corporations have trumpeted such plans in the past month. U.S. companies have announced more than $178 billion in planned buybacks — the largest amount unveiled in a single quarter, according to Birinyi Associates, a market research firm. 

Such purchases reduce a company’s total number of outstanding shares, giving each remaining share a slightly bigger piece of the profit pie. 

Cisco said this month that in response to the tax package, it would bring back to the United States $67 billion of overseas cash, using $25 billion to finance additional share repurchases. Alphabet, the parent company of Google, authorized up to $8.6 billion in stock purchases. PepsiCo announced a fresh $15 billion in planned buybacks. Chip gear maker Applied Materials disclosed plans for a $6 billion program to buy shares. Late last month, home improvement retailer Lowe’s unveiled plans for $5 billion in purchases. 

On Monday, Buffett said on CNBC that Berkshire might be open to buy some of its shares. The remarks helped send Berkshire’s stock — and the broader market — higher. 

More buybacks are almost certainly on the way. UBS analysts covering Apple said the iPhone maker might authorize another $30 billion in share purchases when it reports its next quarterly earnings in April. That would be on top of the $30 billion it spends each year to buy back its shares. 

“I’m expecting buybacks to get to a record for 2018,” said Howard Silverblatt, a senior index analyst with S&P Dow Jones Indices. “And if I’m disappointed, there’s a lot of people with me.” 

The flurry of planned buybacks has been good for the stock market. Early this month, stocks were down more than 10 percent from their January peak. The prospect of companies flooding markets with “buy” orders helped the market recoup some of its losses. 

The broader impact on the economy is less clear. Economists believe a rising stock market benefits the economy, helping support consumer and business confidence. But the vast majority of the billions of dollars in planned share purchases will benefit the richest 10 percent of U.S. households, who own 84 percent of all stocks. The top 1 percent of households own about 40 percent of all stocks. 

Ultimately, the effect of the rising stock market depends on how those wealthy investors use their windfall. It helps the economy more, for example, if they put the money toward productive new companies than if they invest in government bonds. 

Companies typically decide to make long-term investments in things like new workers and factories based on whether they will make the company more profitable — not merely because the companies are sitting on a pile of money that they otherwise would have paid in taxes. 

At a news conference Thursday, the head of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, Kevin Hassett, acknowledged that many companies were spending their money on buying their own shares. 

“Right now we’re going to have an adjustment where you see probably more dividends and share buybacks than wage increases,” Hassett said. “But going forward we’re going to see a lot of capital formation and wage growth.”  

That is not what happened in 2005, when a one-time tax holiday allowed companies to repatriate money on the cheap. That plan, championed by President George W. Bush, was sold as a way to get U.S. companies to invest more in the domestic economy. 

Some $300 billion came back to the United States that year. But economists estimated that as much as 92 percent of it may have been paid out to companies’ shareholders — mostly in the form of buybacks. 

Studies have shown that the tax change lifted companies’ stock prices but did not expand their U.S. workforces. 

Until the early 1980s, the practice of buying shares with corporate money was considered borderline illegal because it was thought to potentially open the company up to charges of manipulating share prices. 

But in 1982 the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule that gave the green light to most share repurchases, as long as they followed certain rules. 

Historically, U.S. companies had paid out profits with a quarterly check, known as a dividend. But after the SEC’s rule change, companies started using more of their profits to buy their own shares, in the process giving their shareholders a bigger piece of the company. 

Buybacks soon soared. By 2016, the most recent year for which there is complete data, companies spent $536 billion on purchasing their own shares, according to data from S&P Dow Jones Indices. 

That was about 5 percent less than those companies spent on new plants, research and development and other investments. By contrast, 20 years ago, companies spent four times as much on such investments as they did on buybacks.  

Some economists think the surge in share buybacks has something to do with the relative decline in capital investments, which recently have been lower than expected. 

“We have some causal evidence that because of short-termism companies are doing some stock repurchases that maybe they shouldn’t do,” said Heitor Almeida, a professor of corporate finance at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. “And maybe that’s causing them to reduce investment.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

With session done, what is Senate President Negron’s political future?
With session done, what is Senate President Negron’s political future?

If you had asked Senate President Joe Negron what his plans were immediately following the close of the 2018 session of the Florida Legislature on March 11, he would have told you he was leaving that night to go home to Stuart. But if you ask Negron – who served in the Florida House for six years prior to his 2009 election to the Senate &ndash...
For Russia’s Putin, pressure pays off in facing weak, divided West
For Russia’s Putin, pressure pays off in facing weak, divided West

The U.S. and Europe appeared last week to be lining up alongside the U.K. for a new round of pressure against Vladimir Putin over Russia's alleged use of a nerve agent to poison a former spy outside London.  But the West's united front didn't last long. President Donald Trump didn't even bring up the case in a call to congratulate Putin on his...
CNN chief calls Fox News ‘propaganda machine,’ and Hannity responds
CNN chief calls Fox News ‘propaganda machine,’ and Hannity responds

CNN President Jeff Zucker thinks that President Donald Trump's "fake news" attacks and anti-media criticism have pushed journalists to press harder for the truth, making "American journalism great again."  The exception? Fox News, he said.  Zucker attacked CNN's rival Thursday during his keynote interview at the Financial...
Two Illinois Democrats are ordered to pay Treasury following congressional ethics probes
Two Illinois Democrats are ordered to pay Treasury following congressional ethics probes

The House Ethics Committee asked two Democratic lawmakers from Illinois to pay the U.S. Treasury after investigations found one used office space in his district for nearly three decades without paying rent and the other paid a staffer-turned-contractor for work that was sometimes legislative in nature.  In lengthy reports released Thursday, the...
Zuckerberg built an instant gratification machine but took his time addressing the trouble it’s caused
Zuckerberg built an instant gratification machine but took his time addressing the trouble it’s caused

After Mark Zuckerberg broke his silence Wednesday about the mushrooming Cambridge Analytica scandal, it's hard to argue the Facebook founder and CEO has said too little.  Zuckerberg wrote a 935-word Facebook post Wednesday where he said "we have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can't then we don't deserve to serve you,"...
More Stories