You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myPalmBeachPost.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myPalmBeachPost.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myPalmBeachPost.com.

breaking news

Ariana Grande to leave Boca, return to Manchester for benefit concert

Despite adverse ruling, Bondi says water dispute with Georgia winnable


With the U.S. Supreme Court expected later this week to review a recommendation that would deny Florida relief in its decades-old water dispute with Georgia, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Tuesday the case is not over yet.

“I think we still have a very good chance of prevailing in this lawsuit,” Bondi said.

The nation’s highest court is scheduled to hold a closed-door conference Friday and review a report from a court-appointed special master who last month recommended that Florida be denied relief in its claim that Georgia’s overconsumption of water was damaging the ecology and economy of Apalachicola Bay in Franklin County.

RELATED: More Florida Legislature coverage

Ralph Lancaster, a Maine lawyer who was the special master, said he could not reach an equitable water-use settlement between Florida and Georgia without the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which was not a party to the lawsuit but controls water flow in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river system through a series of dams and reservoirs. That system runs from North Georgia south to Apalachicola Bay.

Lancaster has recommended that the Supreme Court “conclude that Florida has not proven by clear and convincing evidence that a decree imposing a cap on Georgia’s consumptive water use would result in additional streamflow in Florida at a time that would provide a material benefit to Florida.”

Lancaster’s rejection of Florida’s legal arguments has heightened the scrutiny of legal fees the state has paid in the case.

Latham & Watkins, the lead firm with Supreme Court expertise, has billed Florida for about $36 million since July 2015, according to records collected by the Florida House, which is reviewing the fees.

The state has contested $4.6 million of those fees and has not paid October and November invoices, the records showed.

Bondi said the Latham firm was selected in consultation with Gov. Rick Scott’s office, the Department of Environmental Protection and her solicitor general’s office.

She said the firm has done “a great job,” while adding, “I was very strong when I spoke with the Latham lawyers (in the last two weeks) about spending more money on it, too.”

Bondi said it was necessary to hire a firm with special expertise to handle the complex litigation, which involves a lawsuit filed in 2013 but also more than two decades of “water wars” between the two states over the issue.

“Water is everything to our state. You know how this is impacting the Panhandle,” Bondi said. “It has gone on for way too long. Is that a huge amount in attorney fees? Absolutely. Is it very specialized? Absolutely. Hopefully it will wrap up very soon.”

Asked why she believed the state could prevail despite Lancaster’s recommendation, Bondi declined to elaborate other than saying, “we have some ideas.”

“Let me let the lawyers on the case do their job with my (solicitor general’s) office,” she said.

But Bondi also emphasized the legal fight with Georgia, despite the cost, was necessary because of what was at stake.

“To protect our state and our water rights, we’ve got to do that,” Bondi said. “And I hope we do still have a chance at prevailing. After speaking with them (the Latham firm), I believe we do. If we don’t, we know again, after 20 years, we have done everything we can possibly do.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Rough treatment of journalists in the Trump era
Rough treatment of journalists in the Trump era

For those concerned about press freedom, the first months of the Trump administration have been troubling. Journalists have been yelled at, pepper-sprayed, pinned by security and even arrested on the job. Now, one reporter has accused a Republican candidate of assault.   Joel Simon, the executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists...
Leaks — a uniquely American way of annoying the authorities
Leaks — a uniquely American way of annoying the authorities

  British leaders were infuriated this week when the name of the Manchester concert bomber was disclosed by U.S. officials, and further outraged when The New York Times ran investigators’ photographs of the bomb remnants. After Prime Minister Theresa May complained bitterly to President Donald Trump, he denounced the leaks on Thursday and...
Trump administration considers moving student loans from Education Dept. to Treasury
Trump administration considers moving student loans from Education Dept. to Treasury

The Trump administration is considering moving responsibility for overseeing more than $1 trillion in student debt from the Education Department to the Treasury Department, a switch that would radically change the system that helps 43 million students finance higher education.   The potential change surfaced in a scathing resignation memo...
Trump hails ‘great win in Montana’ as apologetic body-slammer goes to Washington
Trump hails ‘great win in Montana’ as apologetic body-slammer goes to Washington

President Donald Trump applauds Thursday night’s Montana victory by Republican Greg Gianforte.
Analysis: The investigation of Jared Kushner fits a very troubling pattern
Analysis: The investigation of Jared Kushner fits a very troubling pattern

Jared Kushner has just been revealed as the senior White House adviser who is under investigation in the Russia probe - which is news that comes as little surprise. Indeed, when The Washington Post reported last week that a then-unnamed top Donald Trump adviser was a focus, many quickly assumed it was Kushner.   But while those assumptions...
More Stories