POINT OF VIEW: Trump made right call on Jerusalem


President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital — and begin the process to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — has prompted warnings of Arab violence and concern that the move may undermine chances to advance peace efforts.

Those arguments fail to see the entire picture.

Israel offered a solution on Jerusalem during negotiations with the Palestinians. In the year 2000 during the Camp David conference, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered sovereignty over Arab Jerusalem and Palestinian custodianship over the Muslim holy sites. That offer was far-reaching and unprecedented, where Israel broke the dogma of one unified Jerusalem, a gesture President Clinton fully acknowledged and admired.

Likewise, Barak agreed to concede territories in East Jerusalem, the Old City and the Temple Mount. But Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat demanded sovereignty over all of East Jerusalem and over the holy sites.

That negotiation ended in five years of violence called the Second Intifada.

Still, less than half a year after the collapse of Camp David, Israel accepted the “Clinton Parameters,” a proposal for final peace between the parties that again included recognizing East Jerusalem as the capital of the Palestinian state, including the Arab suburbs and the Arab quarters of the Old City.

However, Arafat responded again by demanding control over all the holy sites, Muslim, Christian Jewish and the Western Wall, the holiest site to the Jewish people. This was wholly unrealistic.

But this was not the end. In 2008, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made another offer to Mahmoud Abbas, Arafat’s successor: the Palestinian capital would be in East Jerusalem, and Israel, the Palestinians, Jordan and the U.S. would govern the Old City jointly. The Saudis could be part of it, provided they recognize Israel. The Arab neighborhoods would be part of the Palestinian state, and the Jewish neighborhoods part of Israel. This offer received no response from Abbas.

Is a U.S. embassy in West Jerusalem going to change a Palestinian attitude that has been negative all along? What gesture or step would bring about a positive Palestinian attitude?

The real problem does not lie in the U.S. recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The question is, will the Palestinians come forward? The answer is no. The Palestinian Authority is too weak and illegitimate to make compromises. And Arab countries have done little to support such compromises.

President Trump’s move on Jerusalem sends a clear message to the Palestinians and Arab countries that they no longer can have veto powers on Jerusalem and that, once and for all, they should play a positive role in promoting peace with Israel.

A policy guided by fear of Arab rage would have been be a sign of weakness and a perilously flawed foreign policy. Trump made the right decision.

Luis Fleischman, Jupiter

Editor’s note: Fleischman is an adjunct professor of sociology at Barry University and a Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Research.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW SCOTT STANTIS
POINT OF VIEW: What would gender equality look like?

Women now have male friends who are unsure what is appropriate in today’s social climate. Now that #MeToo led women to publicly speak out about hurtful actions they have endured from men, some men are re-examining jokes they’ve told, hugs they’ve given and flirtations that went awry. First of all, this women’s movement is, or...
Letters County has more to offer tourists than water

County has more to offer than water The article “County weighs price of conserving nature” (Jan. 8) revealed the lack of community leaders who recognize the value and importance of Palm Beach County’s Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESLs). However, the questions asked by representatives of the Tourist Development Council are very...
Friedman: Pausing the ‘Trump Reality Show’ for a technological advance

Donald Trump poses a huge dilemma for commentators: to ignore his daily outrages is to normalize his behavior, but to constantly write about them is to stop learning. Like others, I struggle to get this balance right, which is why I pause today to point out some incredible technological changes that will pose as big an adaptation challenge to American...
Parker: Can there be a charitable reading of Trump’s vulgarity?

While recently perusing unread books gathering dust on my shelves, one tome caught my eye and, upon being loosed from the grip of neglect, fell open to a random page from which leapt the following sentence: “The ancestors of a critical and growing mass of present-day Americans existed in dung heaps of humanity amidst rotting vegetables.&rdquo...
More Stories