breaking news

PHOTO: Car smashes into McDonald’s west of Boynton

POINT OF VIEW: NYT expresses ‘regret’ over white nationalist profile

The New York Times over the weekend published a nicely turned satire — “Choose Your Own Public Apology” — lampooning the men who’ve attempted to make amends for their histories of sexual harassment. In the same time frame, the newspaper’s leadership was figuring out how best to phrase its own regret over a profile of 29-year-old Ohio white nationalist Tony Hovater, whom reporter Richard Fausset depicted as a run-of-the-mill guy with some extreme viewpoints.

“We regret the degree to which the piece offended so many readers,” New York Times national editor Marc Lacey wrote in a carefully drafted response to the social-media backlash against the Hovater profile.

“We recognize that people can disagree on how best to tell a disagreeable story. What we think is indisputable, though, is the need to shed more light, not less, on the most extreme corners of American life and the people who inhabit them. That’s what the story, however imperfectly, tried to do.”

There was a lot of backlash, with some high points duly credited by Lacey’s post.

“We described Mr. Hovater as a bigot, a Nazi sympathizer who posted images on Facebook of a Nazi-like America full of happy white people and swastikas everywhere,” Lacey writes. “We understand that some readers wanted more pushback, and we hear that loud and clear.”

Twitter is a superb ex post facto editor, and its dwellers have suggested some excellent ways in which the Times could have added weight to its piece. Angus Johnston, for instance, posted an interesting thread mining a podcast that was mentioned only briefly in the Fausset profile. And BuzzFeed’s Charlie Warzel noted that the story failed to account for the radicalizing influence of the internet.

No editor — whether at The New York Times or elsewhere — can possibly foresee all the legitimate gripes that’ll surface on social media about a pending story. And the story did get plenty of attention, as Lacey indicates: “Our reporter and his editors agonized over the tone and content of the article,” he wrote. Such agony wasn’t reflected in the piece.


Editor’s note: Erik Wemple is media critic at The Washington Post.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

POINT OF VIEW: A solution to Florida’s dentist shortage

In 2016, nearly 167,000 Floridians with preventable dental diseases showed up in emergency rooms across the state. As a public health dental hygienist, I try to reach many of these individuals: Medicaid patients, patients on private insurance and patients with no insurance at all. Dental hygienists do much more than “clean teeth.” We are...
Letters Take responsibility for own decisions

Take responsibility for own decisions I am always amused by the various complaints about train/airplane/traffic noise lodged by those who choose to live near the source and their demands for relief. If one makes the conscious decision to live near the source of which they complain, they need look no further than the mirror for someone to blame. And...
Opinion: What is the real message of #MeToo?

The feminist website Babe published an account of a date gone bad. The pushback has been swift and sharp. I share some of the concerns of the critics, but I also think young women are sending a message that is being missed. The account by the anonymous “Grace” about a bad date with comedian Aziz Ansari was, if not “3,000 words of...
Editorial: County can ensure women, minorities fair cut of contracts
Editorial: County can ensure women, minorities fair cut of contracts

Palm Beach County isn’t wasting time. About $40 million of the money collected from the 2016 sales tax increase already has been spent, says County Administrator Verdenia Baker. A road project here, some bridge work there — it doesn’t take long for the expenditures to add up. Unfortunately, it’s still business as usual in the...
More Stories