You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myPalmBeachPost.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myPalmBeachPost.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myPalmBeachPost.com.

POINT OF VIEW Leave hunting decisions to experts, not public opinion


Do we “need” a bear hunt in Florida? Of course not. We also don’t need to catch sailfish and marlin for sport. We don’t even need to fish for food, as seafood is readily available in every restaurant and grocery store. In reality, we don’t even need to print newspapers, since we can read them online and save trees. Yet we do these things because we can and we enjoy doing them, all without threatening the natural resource.

However, every time a new hunting season is proposed anywhere in the United States, we can count on a flurry of protest from anti-hunting groups like The Humane Society of the United States. (“Point of View: Another Florida black bear hunt makes no sense,” Wednesday).

With few exceptions, hunting and fishing seasons are not based on need. They are based on the fact that a limited amount of animals or fish can be harvested without hurting the population of that species.

Groups like The Humane Society are simply opposed to hunting. Period. They could care less about whether there is an actual need or if a hunting season is biologically sound or not.

Along with claiming there is no need, groups like these use melodramatic statements like “…coupled with roadkill numbers, nuisance bears killed, and poaching, may well plunge multiple sub-populations into sharp decline.” These copy-and-paste statements are used in opposing any hunting anywhere in the United States, they simply change the name of the animal.

Finally, groups will claim that the public also agrees with them on whatever issue they are promoting. In this case, The Humane Society used a questionable group called Remington Research. Just last year, the Democrats were claiming this group was bogus and skewed its polls to favor Republicans.

However, regardless of some poll, when managing our natural resources, public opinion is a poor way of doing it. Consider some the past results of allowing public opinion to manage our resources. My favorite Florida example was draining the Everglades, because the public thought that is was just a useless mosquito-infested swamp. That certainly worked well.

Federal and state governments created departments to manage our natural resources. Instead of public opinion, these departments are staffed by biologists and people actually educated in wildlife and the environment.

So let’s leave the question of a bear hunt in Florida to people with actual knowledge and education on the subject.

JIM WEIX, PALM CITY

Editor’s note: The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission announced Wednesday that it would not hold a bear hunt for at least two years.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters Educate boaters regarding ‘no-wake zones’

Educate boaters re: no-wake zones I wasn’t surprised to read about the injured rower, “Injured teen rower still in hospital,” (Sunday), in The Post. Boaters frequently ignore the “no wake zone” in and around this area. I am not sure if it’s lack of education on the boaters part or lack of police presence. If the...
POINT OF VIEW FPL’s solar progress in step with Audubon’s goals
POINT OF VIEW FPL’s solar progress in step with Audubon’s goals

On a sunny Florida day in South Florida, I watched the American flag rise and fly over hundreds of acres of black solar cells. It was an amazing experience to think that the million panels I was looking at were replacing energy from conventional fuel combustion plants. Yet this solar field feeding directly into the power grid was not using any water...
CARTOON
CARTOON

CARTOON VIEW JOHN BRANCH
Editorial: Forget ‘death spiral,’ Obamacare should be fixed, not killed
Editorial: Forget ‘death spiral,’ Obamacare should be fixed, not killed

An inconvenient fact is elbowing its way into the national discussion about Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), to use the formal name, is not “failing,” not “exploding,” not in “death spiral.” It’s not, that is, unless President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress push it over a ledge. Which Trump...
Rampell: Hurting those who help veterans

Government officials often pay lip service to “supporting our troops.” But some of the people who literally do that vital work have just been badly shortchanged. For at least the third time in two years, the National Guard Bureau has awarded a contract for military family services to a lowball bidder. For the third time, that bid was based...
More Stories