Friedman: Trump, Pruitt ignore climate change at nation’s, world’s peril


America faces two serious national security threats that look wildly different but have one core feature in common — they both have a low probability of happening, but, if they did happen, they could have devastating consequences for our whole world.

One of these threats is North Korea. If Kim Jong Un is able to launch missiles that strike the U.S. mainland, the effect will be incalculable.

And even though the odds are low — it would be an act of suicide by the North Korean dynasty — President Donald Trump is ready to spend billions on anti-missile systems, warships, cyberdefenses, air power and war games to defuse and deter this threat.

And if we prepare for an attack and it never happens, we will be left with some improved weaponry that we might be able to use in other theaters — but nothing particularly productive for our economy or job creation.

The other low-probability, high-impact threat is climate change. The truth is, if you simply trace the steady increase in costly extreme weather events — wildfires, floods, droughts and climate-related human migrations — the odds of human-driven global warming having a devastating effect on our planet are not low-probability but high-probability.

But let’s assume for a minute that because climate change is a complex process — which we do not fully understand — climate change is a low-probability, high-impact event just like a North Korean nuclear strike. What is the Trump team doing when confronted with this similar threat?

It’s taking a spike and poking out its own eyes. In possibly the most intellectually corrupt declaration of the Trump era — a high bar — Scott Pruitt, a longtime shill for oil and gas companies now masquerading as the head of the EPA, actually declared that even discussing possible links between human-driven climate disruptions and the recent monster storms was “insensitive.” He said that after our country got hit by two Atlantic Category 4 hurricanes in the same year for the first time since records have been kept — storms made more destructive by rising ocean levels and warmer ocean waters.

Makes me wonder … if Pruitt were afflicted with cancer, would he not want scientists discussing with him, let alone researching, the possible causes and solutions? Wouldn’t want to upset him.

What if we were to prepare for disruptive climate change and it doesn’t get as bad as feared? Where will we be? Well, we will have cleaner air, less childhood asthma, more innovative building materials and designs, and cleaner, more efficient power generation and transportation systems — all of which will be huge export industries and create tens of thousands of good jobs.

Trump has recently fired various knuckle-headed aides whose behavior was causing him short-term embarrassment. The person he needs to fire is Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is going to cause Trump long-term embarrassment. They are authoring a new national security doctrine — one that says when faced with a low-probability, high-impact event like North Korea, the U.S. should spend any amount of money, and if the threat doesn’t materialize, well, we’ll have a lot of Army surplus and scrap metal.

But when faced with an actual high-probability, high-impact threat called climate change, we should do nothing and poke our eyes out, even though if the effect is less severe — and we prepare for it anyway — we will be left healthier, stronger, more productive, more resilient and more respected around the world.

That is the Pruitt-Trump Doctrine — soon to be known as “Trump’s Folly.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial: 25-story One Flagler too much for West Palm waterfront
Editorial: 25-story One Flagler too much for West Palm waterfront

It looks beautiful in the drawings. The proposed One Flagler in West Palm Beach — designed by renowned architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, of New York’s Freedom Tower — is less an office tower than a work of art: tiered, slender, luminous, yet restrained. The tower’s developers, The Related Cos., admirably intend to preserve...
Letters: Time to rethink placement of hardwood trees
Letters: Time to rethink placement of hardwood trees

It appeared to me that most of the damage during the recent storm was done by falling trees and tree branches. But with few exceptions, palms were not the problem. Hardwood trees were. In my community, the standard set by Palm Beach County for a typical 5,000 square-foot property is followed, and that calls for one palm tree and two hardwood trees...
POINT OF VIEW: Public school financing must change

With the increasing federal drumbeat to spend a trillion dollars rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure through public-private partnerships, public school districts should seize the same opportunity. Since the public sector often is criticized for paying too much and taking too long, it is time to enlist the private sector’s expertise and...
Commentary: Why didn’t Equifax protect your data?
Commentary: Why didn’t Equifax protect your data?

When the credit-reporting agency Equifax announced this month that hackers had accessed the accounts of 143 million of its customers — over 40 percent of the population of the United States — it was another example of how little power consumers have over their own money and personal information. Indeed, it unfolded in a familiar way: Equifax...
Palm Beach Post editorial cartoon: Sept. 24
Palm Beach Post editorial cartoon: Sept. 24

CARTOON VIEW LISA BENSON
More Stories