Friedman: We’re connected online, but no one’s in charge to stop abuses


There is an abiding dream in the tech world that when all the planet’s people and data are connected it will be a better place. That may prove true. But getting there is turning into a nightmare — a world where billions of people are connected but without sufficient legal structures, security protections or moral muscles to handle all these connections without abuse.

Lately, it feels as if we’re all connected but no one’s in charge.

Equifax, the credit reporting bureau, became brilliant at vacuuming up personal credit data — without your permission — and selling it. But it was so lax that it left a hole for hackers to get the personal information of some 146 million Americans, or nearly half the country.

But don’t worry, Equifax ousted CEO Richard Smith, with “a payday worth as much as $90 million — or roughly 63 cents for every customer whose data was potentially exposed in its recent security breach,” Fortune reported. That will teach him!

Smith and his board should be in jail. I’m with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who told CNBC, “So long as there is no personal responsibility when these big companies breach consumers’ trust, let their data get stolen, cheat their consumers … then nothing is going to change.”

Facebook, Google and Twitter are different animals in my mind. They’ve all connected more people than they can manage and they’ve been naive about how many bad guys were abusing their platforms.

As Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, put it to me, “Up to now, these companies have not taken the threat that Russia and other foreign agents pose to our system seriously enough or invested enough or to really reveal what happened in 2016 — or what is still happening now.”

One reason Facebook was slow to respond is that its business model was to absorb all of the readers of the mainstream media and to absorb all their advertisers — but as few of their editors as possible. An editor is a human being you have to pay to bring editorial judgment to your content, to make sure things are accurate and to correct them if they’re not. Social networks preferred to use algorithms instead, but these are easily gamed.

Our democracy is built on two principles: truth and trust. We trust that our elections are fair and that enables our peaceful rotations of power. And we trust that the news we get is true and that it is corrected if it is not. And we expect our president to defend both. But our president is a liar who refuses to hold Russia to account for anything. It’s a terrible combination.

These companies make billions selling our data, but they’re ambivalent about taking responsibility “for the uses, and abuses, of their platforms,” argued Harvard political philosopher Michael Sandel. “They can’t have it both ways. If they claim they are neutral pipes and wires, like the phone company or the electric company, they should be regulated as public utilities. But if, on the other hand, they want to claim the freedoms associated with news media, they can’t deny responsibility for promulgating fake news.”

“These platforms are so dominant that, like electric wires or telephone lines, we can scarcely avoid using them. But when they allow our personal data — or elections — to be hacked,” Sandel said, “there’s not much we can do about it.”

“A century ago, we found ways to rein in the unaccountable power associated with the Industrial Revolution,” Sandel concluded. “Today, we need to figure out how to rein in the unaccountable power associated with the digital revolution.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters Hoping for an end to Flagler Shore

Hoping for an end to Flagler Shore The Fix Flagler Initiative and committee appreciate the Palm Beach Post for its unbiased coverage of the Flagler Shore project and its openness to printing so many letters to the editor from concerned citizens who oppose the project. On Jan. 29, well over 150 citizens attended a West Palm Beach City Council meeting...
Letters Editorial about NRA right on the mark

Editorial about NRA right on the mark I thought your editorial, “Our kids are dying; end NRA’s grip on our laws” (Sunday), was excellent. I was struck by that part which said, “Because, in America, your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is apparently just words on a document. These are supposed to be inalienable...
Opinion: Will automation kill our jobs?

A recent article in The Guardian dons the foreboding title “Robots will destroy our jobs — and we’re not ready for it.” The article claims, “For every job created by robotic automation, several more will be eliminated entirely. … This disruption will have a devastating impact on our workforce.” According to...
POINT OF VIEW:

It’s been almost 18 years since I lived through a school shooting. My good friend, Barry Grunow, was murdered on the last day of school by a student who brought a gun onto our campus. The recent Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting has opened up some old wounds. Do the people I worked with know how much and how often I think about them?...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW LEE JUDGE
More Stories