You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

breaking news

Florida lawmakers move closer to gambling deal

Editorial: Vote ‘yes’ to retain state Supreme Court, 4th DCA judges

Palm Beach County voters will see three Florida Supreme Court justices and six 4th District Court of Appeal judges up for merit retention on the Nov. 8 ballot.

The Post recommends that all nine — Chief Justice Jorge Labarga, Justice Charles T. Canady and Justice Ricky Polston for the Supreme Court; Chief Judge Cory J. Ciklin, and Judges Dorian K. Damoorgian, Jonathan D. Gerber, Robert M. Gross, Spencer D. Levin and Melanie G. May on the 4th DCA — be retained.

Florida has had a long and successful policy of using merit retention elections as a democratic check on appellate court judges. The system allows voters to decide whether a sitting appellate judge should remain on the bench with a simple ballot question: “Shall Justice/Judge (name) of the _________ court be retained in office?” The system applies to all state judges on the courts of appeal, including the Florida Supreme Court.

The great advantage of merit retention, implemented — after a series of judicial scandals — in 1976 to make the Florida court system more professional, makes the high-level judiciary part of the democratic process. But by limiting the ballot question to issues of “merit,” the judges avoid the political pressures of testy, often negative partisan races which can destroy faith in the legitimacy and fairness of the court system.

Yes, merit retention has its critics. Some correctly point out that no Florida appellate judge or Supreme Court justice has been removed through retention elections. But the fact that voters are generally satisfied with the state judiciary should be seen as a vote for the quality of the judiciary, not a failure of the system.

A recent survey of members of the Florida Bar found that 8 of 10 bar members who had knowledge of the judges on the ballot — especially those who try cases before them — favored their retention.

The removal of a judge should not be done lightly, or easily. They are faced with many challenging cases that can call for rulings that may be polarizing or unpopular. The demands of public opinion and justice can often differ. Merit retention balances the need of the judiciary to be answerable to the people, with the need to have judges act on law instead of public opinion.

We recommend voting “yes” on your ballot to retain these appellate judges.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The nightmare of the North Korea-Trump standoff

President Donald Trump is scary in many ways, but perhaps the most frightening nightmare is of him blundering into a new Korean war. It would begin because the present approach of leaning on China to pressure North Korea will likely fail. Trump will grow angry at public snickering at the emptiness of his threats. At some point, U.S. intelligence will...
Letters Educate boaters regarding ‘no-wake zones’

Educate boaters re: no-wake zones I wasn’t surprised to read about the injured rower, “Injured teen rower still in hospital,” (Sunday), in The Post. Boaters frequently ignore the “no wake zone” in and around this area. I am not sure if it’s lack of education on the boaters part or lack of police presence. If the...
POINT OF VIEW FPL’s solar progress in step with Audubon’s goals
POINT OF VIEW FPL’s solar progress in step with Audubon’s goals

On a sunny Florida day in South Florida, I watched the American flag rise and fly over hundreds of acres of black solar cells. It was an amazing experience to think that the million panels I was looking at were replacing energy from conventional fuel combustion plants. Yet this solar field feeding directly into the power grid was not using any water...

Editorial: Forget ‘death spiral,’ Obamacare should be fixed, not killed
Editorial: Forget ‘death spiral,’ Obamacare should be fixed, not killed

An inconvenient fact is elbowing its way into the national discussion about Obamacare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), to use the formal name, is not “failing,” not “exploding,” not in “death spiral.” It’s not, that is, unless President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress push it over a ledge. Which Trump...
More Stories