breaking news

Florida Supreme Court to air hearings on Facebook Live

Editorial: Vote ‘yes’ to retain state Supreme Court, 4th DCA judges

Palm Beach County voters will see three Florida Supreme Court justices and six 4th District Court of Appeal judges up for merit retention on the Nov. 8 ballot.

The Post recommends that all nine — Chief Justice Jorge Labarga, Justice Charles T. Canady and Justice Ricky Polston for the Supreme Court; Chief Judge Cory J. Ciklin, and Judges Dorian K. Damoorgian, Jonathan D. Gerber, Robert M. Gross, Spencer D. Levin and Melanie G. May on the 4th DCA — be retained.

Florida has had a long and successful policy of using merit retention elections as a democratic check on appellate court judges. The system allows voters to decide whether a sitting appellate judge should remain on the bench with a simple ballot question: “Shall Justice/Judge (name) of the _________ court be retained in office?” The system applies to all state judges on the courts of appeal, including the Florida Supreme Court.

The great advantage of merit retention, implemented — after a series of judicial scandals — in 1976 to make the Florida court system more professional, makes the high-level judiciary part of the democratic process. But by limiting the ballot question to issues of “merit,” the judges avoid the political pressures of testy, often negative partisan races which can destroy faith in the legitimacy and fairness of the court system.

Yes, merit retention has its critics. Some correctly point out that no Florida appellate judge or Supreme Court justice has been removed through retention elections. But the fact that voters are generally satisfied with the state judiciary should be seen as a vote for the quality of the judiciary, not a failure of the system.

A recent survey of members of the Florida Bar found that 8 of 10 bar members who had knowledge of the judges on the ballot — especially those who try cases before them — favored their retention.

The removal of a judge should not be done lightly, or easily. They are faced with many challenging cases that can call for rulings that may be polarizing or unpopular. The demands of public opinion and justice can often differ. Merit retention balances the need of the judiciary to be answerable to the people, with the need to have judges act on law instead of public opinion.

We recommend voting “yes” on your ballot to retain these appellate judges.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

Letters Mishandled Riviera Marina now a no-man’s land

Riviera Marina now a no-man’s land I want to thank the city of Riviera Beach for turning the once-thriving 13th Street Marina into a desolate no-man’s land. Where there once was a thriving family-owned restaurant that seated upward of 200 diners and live music daily, situated on the shoreline overlooking the marina and Intracoastal Waterway...
Editorial: Among Democrats, Berman best successor to Clemens
Editorial: Among Democrats, Berman best successor to Clemens

When state Sen. Jeff Clemens abruptly resigned his seat in October, it left District 31 without one of the most influential and dynamic voices in the Florida Legislature. Clemens, an Atlantis Democrat who resigned after admitting to an affair with a lobbyist, had risen to become a Democratic leader in a Republican-dominated Senate. The Post believes...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

POINT OF VIEW: A solution to Florida’s dentist shortage

In 2016, nearly 167,000 Floridians with preventable dental diseases showed up in emergency rooms across the state. As a public health dental hygienist, I try to reach many of these individuals: Medicaid patients, patients on private insurance and patients with no insurance at all. Dental hygienists do much more than “clean teeth.” We are...
More Stories