Editorial: PBC right to seek tax to recoup president-hosting costs


Since being sworn in as president less than two months ago, President Donald J. Trump has spent five weekends, including this one, at his gilded estate Mar-a-Lago, which he has dubbed his “Southern White House.”

While this is certainly an honor for the area, protecting the Leader of the Free World and his considerable retinue comes with certain costs.

So far, the bill to the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office alone is at least $1.4 million. That’s what Sheriff Ric Bradshaw estimated in mid-February, a couple of presidential visits ago. The total, of course, has risen since then.

These are expenses that the federal government should bear – or at least share. It shouldn’t fall to the residents of this county alone. Yet so far, the outlook is discouraging.

Trump supporters ask: Why the fuss? Other presidents incurred huge taxpayer expenses when they traveled and took vacations. Look at President Barack Obama!

This is different. These visits are too frequent to be considered mere vacations. For years as a private citizen, Trump spent nearly every wintry weekend flying down here from New York City. It’s clear he means to keep that habit. As County Commissioner Dave Kerner said, “We’re getting to the point where he’s governing from here.”

That’s inarguable. The president has hosted the Japanese prime minister and his wife here. He is expecting the Chinese president next month. He and his aides monitored the surprise news of a North Korean missile test here — in full view of camera-snapping diners at the Mar-a-Lago Club.

That “Southern White House” moniker is one phrase that Trump means literally as well as seriously.

By using the Palm Beach mansion as a de facto Executive Mansion, Trump’s travel is bound to be much more expensive than that of other presidents. According to the Washington Post, Trump’s first three presidential visits to Mar-a-Lago — in just his first month in office — cost the federal treasury some $10 million. That’s one-tenth of what Obama’s extracurricular travel and safety cost over eight years. Trump’s on track, in other words, to exceed that in one year.

Meanwhile, flight restrictions imposed to ensure the president’s safety shut down the nearby Lantana airport every hour that he’s here, grounding operations for days and imperiling employment for 250 people.

The county commissioners have asked nicely for reimbursement. Commissioner Mary Lou Berger says that she, Bradshaw and a county administrator recently held a conference call with officials from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secret Service, Congressional Budget Office and Federal Emergency Management Agency.

So far, nothing. “They were very polite,” Berger said, “but that’s where they stopped. I did not get a lot of encouragement.”

So we applaud Kerner for trying to put some muscle into the effort. He’s come up with a novel idea: imposing a tax on any special benefit the county has provided to the president by declaring Mar-a-Lago “a municipal service benefit unit.”

Florida statutes allow for such units, which typically tax things like street lighting and road paving that incur an unusual public expense. One hitch: the statute authorizes county commissioners to create these units in unincorporated areas. That would seem to leave Mar-a-Lago, located in the Town of Palm Beach, out of reach.

Kerner, however, has asked the county attorney to scour case law. The hope is to show that the county’s home-rule authority gives it leeway to establish such a unit, despite the statutory language.

This battle is not personal or political about the president, the first-year commissioner, a Democrat, said. “It’s about protecting our local tax base.”

Local government has a finite amount of money to work with, and these presidential-security expenses are an additional factor that must be accounted for. If local government must pay millions to protect the president, that’s money unavailable for vital local needs.

Simple fairness dictates that if the president is going to use a county residence as a part-time working White House, then the costs of supporting that part-time working White House be borne by the entire nation, not just those of us who happen to pay local taxes here.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW ED GAMBLE
POINT OF VIEW:

Following the atrocity in Parkland, America is once again at a crossroads. If we fail to act yet again, our nation will continue to witness the annual slaughter of nearly 40,000 of our fellow citizens. The status quo is not sustainable as the social fabric is being torn apart. Young people are growing up in a world in which they believe that everyone...
Opinion: Gun control about saving lives, not waging culture wars

WASHINGTON — You have perhaps heard the joke about the liberal who is so open-minded that he can’t even take his own side in an argument. What’s less funny is that on gun control, liberals have been told for years that if they do take their own side in the argument, they will only hurt their cause. Supporters of even modest restrictions...
Opinion: Respect first, then gun control.

This has been an emotional week. We greet tragedies like the school shooting in Florida with shock, sadness, mourning and grief that turns into indignation and rage. The anger inevitably gets directed at the NRA, those who support gun rights and the politicians who refuse to do anything while children die. Many of us walked this emotional path. But...
Opinion: Photo captures Trump's notes for listening session
Opinion: Photo captures Trump's notes for listening session

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump held a worthwhile listening session Wednesday featuring a range of views on how to combat gun violence in schools. And while Trump's at-times-meandering comments about arming teachers will certainly raise eyebrows, for the most part he did listen. Thanks in part, it seems, to a helpful reminder. Washington...
More Stories