You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myPalmBeachPost.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myPalmBeachPost.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myPalmBeachPost.com.

Editorial: End trade embargo to see real change in Cuba


There was no doubt that history was being made here Sunday afternoon.

Wave after wave of Cubans and American tourists made their way to the south end of Terminal 2 in Jose Marti International Airport to see the landing of Air Force One on the tarmac; bodies pressed 20-deep against the glass wall. A swell of pride grew into a crescendo of hoots and hollers of approval.

If executive orders and grand gestures were all it took to help bring democracy to the 11 million residents of this communist island, one would think President Barack Obama brought with him a solution that many have longed for.

He hasn’t, of course. What the Cuban people desire can be bestowed only by the U.S. Congress: ending the decades-old U.S.-Cuba trade embargo.

They have come to learn, and lament, that this American president — the first to set foot on Cuban soil in 88 years — can do only so much. He can’t lift an embargo that stifles not only their lot in life but any chance at some form of democracy.

They don’t care, many of them told us as their voices rose. They just know it must happen — soon.

We agree. The hope was that 15 months ago, when Obama announced a bold move toward thawing more than a half-century of Cold War relations with the government of Cuban revolutionary-turned-dictator Fidel Castro, that Congress would eventually follow suit on ending the embargo.

This Congress doesn’t like to follow this president, however. Worse, it doesn’t look like it will happen in the nine months remaining in Obama’s final term. That means the Castro regime will continue using it to demonize the U.S. and maintain its grip on power.

Critics are right to hammer away at Cuba’s atrocious human rights record and strict limits on media via the Internet, public speech, assembly and dissent. In 2015, more than 8,600 people considered political prisoners were arrested or detained in some way. And hours before Obama’s flight landed Sunday, nearly three dozen members of the female protest group Ladies in White were arrested by Cuban police.

Obama, in his joint news conference with President Raul Castro Monday, confirmed that he still plans to meet with dissidents. He is unlikely to return with any pledges for change from the Castro regime.

But for everyday Cubans struggling to live off of an average $22 a month from the state — if they can find a job with the state — the first step to changing anything is ending the U.S. embargo.

“We all thought after Obama’s announcement months ago that the embargo would be coming down,” Dariel, who makes more in a week driving tourists than he does in a few months as an X-ray technician, said through a translator. “But that didn’t happen, so we are just waiting. Everything else will happen after that.”

Not that ending the embargo will solve every problem — at least right away. Expect the Castro regime to still control the anticipated flow of investment capital from companies like Xerox, Marriott and Starwood Hotels. Expect also that the regime will dictate what businesses can be owned by whom.

We shouldn’t expect major change overnight. But opening things up will give hope to a talented, hardworking and industrious people — particularly a generation of highly educated younger Cubans who grow increasingly frustrated for change.

These are the same young Cubans who hold Obama in such high regard and are pinning their hopes for the future on his efforts to persuade a reluctant Congress.

There are no guarantees that lifting the embargo will bring about the change our leaders seek. But after 50 years, don’t the Cuban people deserve a shot at it?


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Friedman: Where did ‘We the People’ go?

A few days ago, I was at a conference in Montreal, and a Canadian, trying to grasp what’s happening to America, asked me a simple question: “What do you fear most these days?” “I fear we’re seeing the end of ‘truth,’” I said, “that we simply can’t agree anymore on basic facts. And I fear that...
Parker: Can words be lethal?

Words matter, journalists are fond of saying. This comes lately in the context of presidential tweets that conceivably could have serious repercussions. Otherwise, we seem conflicted about how much words should matter. Political correctness, or ignorance, has caused us to discard words and expressions that some find offensive, despite constitutional...
Letters Easy changes would simplify health care

Easy changes would simplify health care I would like to extend the letter titled, “Medicare for all solves everything” (May 28), two steps further. Every time a health care insurance company pays your bill, they take out their cut since they have administrative expenses to pay and they are profit-making organizations. Take them out of the...
COMMENTARY: Off into the jungle of political suspicion

Let it be said that for one lovely moment, House Speaker Paul Ryan and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi responded exactly as those in authority should to a shocking assault on human lives and our political system. After last week’s shooting on a baseball field, both spoke in a spirit of thoughtful solidarity and genuinely mutual concern....
Opinion: After the ISIS war, a U.S.-Russia collision?

On Sunday, a Navy F-18 Hornet shot down a Syrian air force jet, an act of war against a nation with which Congress has never declared or authorized a war. Washington says the Syrian plane was bombing U.S.-backed rebels. Damascus says its plane was attacking ISIS. Vladimir Putin’s defense ministry was direct and blunt: “Repeated combat actions...
More Stories