Don’t kill the Endangered Species Act


The Endangered Species Act is in jeopardy. Forces hostile to the law are now running Washington. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, says the law is not working and must be “modernized.” Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, says the law has been “hijacked” by environmental extremists and must be “repealed and replaced” with a law giving states the ultimate authority over the fate of imperiled species.

Opponents of the ESA falsely claim that the law has failed in its basic goal of species recovery. Barrasso cites the fact that only 47 of the 1,642 species currently listed under the act have recovered to the point where the law’s protection is no longer needed. Barrasso offers this explanation: “As a doctor, if I admit 100 patients to the hospital and only 3 recover enough under my treatment to be discharged, I would deserve to lose my medical license.”

This argument ignores the fundamental reasons that species become endangered in the first place. Habitat loss from farming, mining, logging, road building, oil and gas development, urban sprawl, and many other economic activities account for more than 80 percent of the species on the list. In some cases, like the black-footed ferret, Kirtland’s warbler, and California red-legged frog, species have lost more than 90 percent of their historic range.

And contrary to the meme of the “pit bull of environmental law,” the ESA does not prevent the continued loss of habitat. In fact, the law specifically allows continued destruction of habitat so long as it does not “jeopardize” species survival. But studies confirm that jeopardy findings are extremely rare despite significant impacts on vulnerable animals.

The ESA also allows “incidental take permits,” which are in effect licenses to kill endangered species and destroy habitat in exchange for commitments from landowners to offset those losses through techniques that may or may not prove effective over time. And should these plans fail, landowners are given ironclad assurances that they will not be asked to do anything more. The costs of failure fall squarely on the species, not the developer.

No wonder recovery takes so long when so much habitat has already been chopped up, and when the continuing threats from pollution, invasive species and the ecosystem-altering effects of climate change pose ever greater dangers. The ecological damage caused by the unsustainable consumption of natural resources in a highly industrialized society cannot be reversed in a matter of decades.

In fact, it is a wonder that the act has succeeded as well as it has against overwhelming odds and little support from the Congress.

The ESA is wildly popular with the American public. A recent poll conducted by Tulchin Research for Defenders of Wildlife found that 90 percent of Americans support strengthening the ESA. Sixty-six percent of respondents rejected the idea that protection of species must come at the expense of jobs and the economy. Perhaps more important to members of Congress, 68 percent of registered voters say they are more likely to vote for a member of Congress who supports environmental safeguards like the Endangered Species Act, Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act.

This is not to say the ESA is perfect. Improvements are badly needed to address the growing threats to our global wildlife heritage. The ESA cannot hope to tackle this challenge alone. But with adequate funding of the act’s core functions, more incentives for private conservation, a broader approach to species protection and habitat conservation, better management of habitat on public lands, and a science- based approach to decision making, more species will be recovered more quickly.

When that happens, the people and communities that depend on healthy ecosystems — which is all of us — will be much the better for it.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Is the party of Lincoln now the party of Lee?

This year will mark my 30th anniversary as a syndicated columnist. During these years, I have written more words than I would have preferred about race. But race is America’s great moral stain and unending challenge. I’ve tackled school choice, affirmative action, transracial adoption, crime, police conduct, family structure, poverty, free-enterprise...
Letters Criminal justice system is failing addicts in crisis

System is failing addicts in crisis I gave a 19-year-old girl released from jail a ride to a Shell gas station and let her use my phone. Twenty-four hours later I got a call from her 77-year-old grandmother trying to find her. The girl was arrested wearing only a white T-shirt with blisters on her feet. Grandma got a call from police saying she was...
POINT OF VIEW: Need resources to spark interest, save performing arts

With the return of the school year upon us, it is important to remember the arts and its importance to the youth of our community. There has been a demise of cultural arts around the world — especially from generation to generation. We can see the impact in our own community. The Boca Pops is gone. The Florida Philharmonic Orchestra is gone....
CARTOON
CARTOON

CARTOON VIEW SIGNE WILKINSON
Editorial: UF made the right call denying ‘alt-right’ leader’s rally
Editorial: UF made the right call denying ‘alt-right’ leader’s rally

University of Florida President Kent Fuchs, citing serious concerns about the safety and security of students, last week denied a white nationalist leader’s request to rent space for a speech on the campus. Fuchs’ decision, which was a surprise reversal from just days prior, was understandable. It was also right. We don’t come to...
More Stories