COMMENTARY: Conservative fantasies are finally colliding with reality


This week the Trump administration put out a budget blueprint — or more accurately, a “budget” blueprint. After all, real budgets detail where the money comes from and where it goes; this proclamation covers only around a third of federal spending, while saying nothing about revenues or projected deficits.

As the fiscal expert Stan Collender put it: “This is not a budget. It’s a Trump campaign press release masquerading as a government document.”

The administration presumably hopes that it will distract the public and the press from the ongoing debacle over health care. But it probably won’t. And in any case, this pseudo-budget embodies the same combination of meanspiritedness and fiscal fantasy that has turned the Republican effort to replace Obamacare into a train wreck.

Think about the vision of government and its role that the right has peddled for decades — that much if not most government spending is a complete waste, doing nobody any good. And to the extent to which spending does help anyone, it’s Those People — lazy, undeserving types who just so happen to be a bit, well, darker than Real Americans.

MORE COMMENTARY: Is a Korean missile crisis on the horizon?

This was the kind of “thinking” that underlay President Trump’s promise to replace Obamacare with something “far less expensive and far better.” After all, it’s a government program, so he assumed that it must be full of waste that a tough leader like him could eliminate.

Strange to say, however, Republicans turn out to have no ideas about how to make the program cheaper other than eliminating health insurance for 24 million people (and making coverage worse, with higher out-of-pocket spending, for those who remain).

Basically the same story applies at a broader level. Consider federal spending as a whole: Outside defense it’s dominated by Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — all programs crucial to tens of millions of Americans, many of them the white working-class voters who are the core of Trump support. Furthermore, most other government spending also serves purposes that are popular, important or (usually) both.

So many people opposed to “big government”?

Many have a distorted view of the numbers. For example, people have a vastly exaggerated view of how much we spend on foreign aid. Many also fail to connect their personal experience with public policy: Large numbers of Social Security and Medicare recipients believe they make no use of any government social program.

LOCAL COMMENTARY: Standing up for yourself if you have a disability.

Thanks to these misperceptions, nurtured by right-wing media, politicians get away with running on promises of drastic spending cuts: Many, perhaps most voters don’t see how such cuts would affect their lives.

But what will happen if anti-big-government politicians find themselves in a position to put their agenda into practice? Voters will quickly get a lesson in what slashing spending really means — and they won’t be happy.

That’s the wall Obamacare repeal has just smashed into. And the same thing will happen if this Trump whatever-it-is turns into an actual budget.

Mr. Trump himself gives every indication of having no idea what the federal government does; his vaguely budget-like document isn’t much more than a roughly scribbled list of numbers, with no clear picture of what those numbers would mean.

But the reality is that the proposed cuts would have ugly, highly visible effects.

Republicans’ budget promises, like their health care promises, have been based on an essentially fraudulent picture of what’s really going on. And now the bill for these lies is coming due.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters: Time to admit it: Flagler changes were a mistake

Time to admit it: Flagler a mistake I agree with the writers regarding Flagler Drive and it being so unsightly. I travel the road two to four times a day. What really bothers me is that it is not being used by pedestrians, bike riders, etc. I have not seen a total of more than six people using the blocked-off road. To top it off, I have seen bike riders...
Editorial cartoon
Editorial cartoon

CARTOON VIEW JACK OHMAN
POINT OF VIEW: Avoiding family conflicts around the holiday table

With Thanksgiving just ahead and Christmas, Hanukkah and other winter celebrations around the corner, most of us are thinking about enjoying the season in the company of family and close friends. But, given today’s contentious political environment, many are also mindful of how political arguments can turn a family celebration into a very uncomfortable...
Christie commentary: Moore puts evangelical hypocrisy on full display
Christie commentary: Moore puts evangelical hypocrisy on full display

Editor’s note: An abridged version of this column appeared earlier on the Post’s Opinion Zone blog . Apparently, there is no more moral test for political candidates … There is only hypocrisy. That’s about the only conclusion you can come to in the wake of the mounting sexual assault allegations against former Alabama...
POINT OF VIEW: District committed, but state budget key to teacher pay

I’d like to respond to Post reader Ernest Terrien’s Nov. 14 Letter to the Editor inquiring about the complete benefits package of a teacher with five years of experience. The average five-year teacher rated as highly effective earns $43,297 for a 196-day contract that includes six paid holidays. In addition to this base salary, teachers...
More Stories