In regard to the letter to the editor “Relatives should have helped nurse,” from a nurse commenting on the article “Bethesda sued over interpreters for deaf,” I strongly disagree, because the writer does not understand deaf peoples’ cultural ways.
It is taboo to have deaf patients’ family members, including small hearing children, become “interpreters” at any hospital or emergency room, because the members would be too emotional to interpret what a doctor or nurse says or would be unable to do so. Some family members are not very skillful with sign language. Moreover, hearing foreign-language translators are widely different from sign-language interpreters.
Subscribers get total access to this story, and all our in-depth news, digital editions and exclusive content. Subscribe today, or try a 24-hour or 7-day digital pass.
Registered Post Subscriber — Sign me in.Sign In
Post Print Subscriber — I need to register my account for digital access.Access Digital
All Day Access — 24-hour digital pass99¢ for 24 hours
All Week Access — 7-day digital pass$3.99 for 7 days
All Access, All the Time — Print & DigitalView Offers