Your many articles and editorials (“Make rate cuts mandatory”) on the 2012 Personal Injury Protection auto insurance legislation have noted that it provides for a premium reduction in exchange for restrictions on PIP coverage. Given that, I was surprised when my recent renewal notice contained not a reduction but an increase in the PIP premium of 19.8 percent.
I was even more surprised when my agent professed to know nothing about the law. Another agent I spoke to opined that there would be no reduction until, and if, the insurance companies realized decreased expenditures as a result of the law. This is another example of legislation that benefits insurance carriers but makes consumer relief optional. So I could not agree more with your position that rate cuts should be made mandatory.
Subscribers get total access to this story, and all our in-depth news, digital editions and exclusive content. Subscribe today, or try a 24-hour or 7-day digital pass.
Registered Post Subscriber — Sign me in.Sign In
Post Print Subscriber — I need to register my account for digital access.Access Digital
All Day Access — 24-hour digital pass99¢ for 24 hours
All Week Access — 7-day digital pass$3.99 for 7 days
All Access, All the Time — Print & DigitalView Offers