New seawall, walkway may fall within exception to alteration rule


Question: Our condominium vinyl seawall was destroyed by Hurricane Irma. The board has a proposal to replace the vinyl seawall with a riprap stone seawall, along with a 4-foot wide gravel walkway. There was no walkway before, and the walkway is being sold to the owners as a splash guard. Another condominium just down the street is having its wall replaced with riprap by the same contractor, but it will not have a walkway. Our documents require an affirmative two-thirds of the vote for a material alteration. Is the walkway a material alteration? — B.C.

Answer: A “material” alteration is one that palpably or perceptively changes the use, function, form or appearance of a common element. Note that the word “material” here is the opposite of “immaterial”— it has nothing to do with the “materials” used in construction.

With no other considerations, changing a vinyl seawall to a stone seawall (a material change in the form and appearance), and adding a walkway (a change in pretty much every category) would likely constitute a material alteration requiring a membership vote.

However, there is a line of arbitration decisions and cases recognizing what is referred to as the “maintenance” exception to the material alteration rule. Arbitrators and judges have sometimes held that, when a board of directors is making what would otherwise be a material change not for the purpose of changing the use, function, form or appearance of the element, but instead in furtherance of the association’s responsibility to maintain and protect the common elements, it constitutes an exception to the general law, and such alteration does not require membership approval.

For example, in one classic decision in this area, an arbitrator held that changing a Chattahoochee pool deck into a paver stone pool deck (obviously something that would otherwise require a membership vote, at least in a condominium) did not require a vote where the purpose of the change was not to change the appearance, but instead to reduce the association’s maintenance expenses and allow the association to more reasonably maintain both the deck itself and the plumbing underneath.

The problem with this line of cases is that they are variable and rely on the individual facts in each situation. Also, some courts have rejected the exception outright. So, if a condo board decides to move forward with a material alteration without a membership vote on the basis of the maintenance exception, they do so knowing that, if challenged in arbitration or court, the outcome is uncertain. Frankly, these cases are not frequently litigated, as there are few people who, for example, feel so strongly about blocking a gravel walkway that they are willing to invest their time and money in arbitration and, likely, further litigation, knowing that if they eventually lose the case, they will be responsible for the association’s reasonable costs and attorney fees. Still, occasionally, I do have clients who have what would appear to be a clear application of the maintenance exception who submit the issue to a member vote because they know that one or more very motivated and financially-able owners are willing to fight the issue for the long haul (whether reasonably or not).

Q: My condominium association bylaws currently allow for or are silent on the matter of whether owners who live elsewhere and rent their units may be eligible to to run for the board of directors. Can our bylaws be amended to exclude this practice? — N.D.

A: In a condominium or a homeowners association, the eligibility to run for the board of directors is established by the governing documents, usually the articles of incorporation or the bylaws. Generally speaking, all owners are, by default, eligible to serve. In a condominium, the law was amended several years ago to allow for the possibility that the bylaws may establish eligibility restrictions — for example, establishing term limits or providing that only resident owners may serve on the board. So, if you are in a condominium, you would simply need to amend your bylaws to create an appropriate restriction. The procedure for amending your bylaws is found in your bylaws themselves, and it usually requires a member vote.

In a homeowner’s association, the law expressly states that all members of the association are eligible to serve on the board of directors and so, unlike in a condominium, most attorneys feel that residency or term restrictions in an HOA would not be legally enforceable.

Ryan Poliakoff is a co-author of “New Neighborhoods — The Consumer’s Guide to Condominium, Co-Op and HOA Living” and a partner at Backer Aboud Poliakoff & Foelster, LLP. Email questions to condocolumn@gmail.com. Please include your hometown.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in

Florida Crystals’ Fanjul brothers inducted into Ag Hall of Fame
Florida Crystals’ Fanjul brothers inducted into Ag Hall of Fame

Florida sugar industry pioneers Alfonso “Alfy” Fanjul, 80, and J. Pepe Fanjul, 73, were inducted into the Florida Agricultural Hall of Fame earlier this month in Tampa. Alfonso Fanjul, chairman and chief executive officer of Florida Crystals Corp., headquartered in West Palm Beach, and his brother Pepe Fanjul, vice chairman, chief operating...
Gibson pushes back against bankruptcy talk, hires new CFO
Gibson pushes back against bankruptcy talk, hires new CFO

Gibson is pushing back against reports of an impending bankruptcy and has hired a new chief financial officer, who starts with the company Monday. Officials with Gibson Brands, Inc., maker of the famed Les Paul and ES-335 electric guitars, released a statement saying the company has met all “current obligations to the bondholders, is in the process...
Palm Beach County mansion sales picked up in January
Palm Beach County mansion sales picked up in January

Palm Beach County’s typical house sold for $325,000 in January, a 4.8 percent increase from a year ago, the Realtors of the Palm Beaches and Greater Fort Lauderdale said Wednesday. While the overall market has been in a holding pattern, mansion sales rose sharply. Realtors reported 104 sales of homes priced at more than $1 million in January...
Social Security: America Saves Week starts Monday
Social Security: America Saves Week starts Monday

A secure retirement is created from a lifetime of planning and saving. Each year, American Savings Education Council and America Saves coordinate America Saves Week. The week is an opportunity for organizations to promote good savings behavior and a chance for individuals to assess their own saving status. For years, Social Security has collaborated...
Put that pen down: Why baby boomers should not co-sign college loans 
Put that pen down: Why baby boomers should not co-sign college loans 

We all know that young people should show respect for their elders. In return, those elders should extend all their resources to the up-and-coming generation. Right? Not so fast, says the Motley Fool. When it comes to co-signing for college loans, parents and grandparents in the Baby Boom generation (born 1946 to 1964) should just say no...
More Stories